VerbFlow@lemmy.world to Fuck AI@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 months agoAgree?lemmy.worldimagemessage-square176fedilinkarrow-up11.45Karrow-down142cross-posted to: fuck_ai@lemmy.world
arrow-up11.41Karrow-down1imageAgree?lemmy.worldVerbFlow@lemmy.world to Fuck AI@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 months agomessage-square176fedilinkcross-posted to: fuck_ai@lemmy.world
minus-squareA_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down3·edit-25 months agoChess engines don’t use machine learning edit: ya know, I get why y’all would downvote my other comments but this one is just a fact.
minus-squareweker01@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up1·5 months agoThis is just wrong. Yes they do. Take stockfish for example. It’s probably the most well known engine. It uses specialized neural networks to evaluate board positions.
minus-squarecrawancon@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down3·5 months agoregardless of the backend mechanism of the particular Ai, it was still always going to encroach on multiple disciplines. maybe robots can do dishes but Ai is more than a robot.
Chess engines don’t use machine learning
edit: ya know, I get why y’all would downvote my other comments but this one is just a fact.
This is just wrong. Yes they do.
Take stockfish for example. It’s probably the most well known engine. It uses specialized neural networks to evaluate board positions.
regardless of the backend mechanism of the particular Ai, it was still always going to encroach on multiple disciplines.
maybe robots can do dishes but Ai is more than a robot.