• damium@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    90
    ·
    3 months ago

    Right image, but under those each one below would also be wearing large pants covering each side of the subtree.

  • palordrolap@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    The first one is clearly wrong because no-one (oh alright, almost no-one, Toe-Jeans Georg) wears leg-wear on our toes.

    Third option: The top layers are covered by a poncho and only the eight pairs at the bottom have leg-wear. This works when considering each subtree as a separate tree in its own right, up to arguing about how many ponchos are then required.

    Fourth option: The top two branches wear leg-wear and those below go in footwear of some sort.

  • Darkraisisi@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Look at this guy not putting on pants because HIS last branch (toes) prevents him. You think the cops will believe that story?