• Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 days ago

    Looking for CSAM is only the excuse they put out. Who knows what they are actually after. Maybe they just want to find compromat on people.

    • FarraigePlaisteach@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      Well, we can’t trust that corruption would be low enough that this wouldn’t be exploited for other reasons. Child trafficking and exploitation is off the charts. If this did actually help those kids I’d consider supporting it. But I do remember when Apple announced that they would do this that some groups that seemed reputable claimed that it wouldn’t actually help. I don’t know what to think of it.

      • sandbox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        14 days ago

        99.9% of CSAM sharing etc. happens on the dark web forums, not on like, whatsapp or signal. So this legislation wouldn’t help prevent or catch those people

    • DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      Its purpose is to quash dissent when the inevitable authoritarian police state comes.

      They won’t let another French revolution happen again

  • sunzu@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 days ago

    These are the same people who allow Catholic clergy to fuck kids… to this day!

    • Lowlee Kun@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      Ohh wait. It is not about the children? Colour me surprised. It is nearly as if it is used as a pretense to strip away our rights 🤔. Just wait for the next big terrorist attack. Then we will get our rights taken away under another pretense 👍

      As long as there are powerful people, they will always use their power to life a live of “rules for thee but not for me”.

  • Chainweasel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 days ago

    While I agree the spread of CSAM needs to be stopped, we can’t violate everyone’s privacy in the effort to do it.
    And are actual people going to be reviewing these messages or are we just going to blindly trust AI not to flag innocent people on accident?

    • mox@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 days ago

      Moreover, there is no way to implement scanning for {something-bad} in our encrypted communications that will not be abused or put people’s safety at risk.

      We need lawmakers to understand this.

    • Balinares@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 days ago

      I mean, client-side scanning would do shit all to help anyway because nothing prevents culprits from encrypting the messages in a different app they are using for sending. This is just entirely a net loss – right as fash are poised to take over too. What a mess.