• EnderMB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    A lot of people are giving Tesla shit here, but surely there should be regulations in place to ensure something like this isn’t allowed to be released for public use?

    • CafecitoHippo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Sure you’d think you wouldn’t need regulations that state that there should be a manual way to open your car door. Have we gotten that stupid? Why in god’s name would you not have that option? What happens if the battery dies and you can’t start the car? You can’t open the door to pop the hood to even jump it. With all the brilliant people that work at a company like Tesla and no one thought there should be a way to open the door from the outside if there’s no power?

      • areyouevenreal@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        They do have a manual way of opening the car door if memory serves. It’s just in a hard to find place where a toddler wouldn’t think to look. Either way it’s a bad design. Nothing wrong with manual door handles imo.

        • CafecitoHippo@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          They have one on the inside but not the outside. That’s why the mom couldn’t get into the vehicle or the firefighters and they had to take an axe to the window. How are you supposed to pop the hood to jump start your car if the battery is dead and you can’t get in the car because the battery is dead? It’s just a stupid design to not have a manual override.

    • TacticsConsort@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Fun fact, a Tesla spokesperson describing the car’s features was talking about how they wanted something on the car that didn’t make it to final release and said “But sadly we couldn’t get that law changed”, which does… kind of imply that they lobbied the regulatory bodies into allowing this piece of shit to exist.

    • cRazi_man@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Every eventuality can’t be covered by regulation. Sometimes you realise something can go disastrously wrong after someone is hurt. I wouldn’t be surprised if this never happened to other mechanical cars to never need regulation. Sometimes you need to wait for a stupid product to exist for someone to make a rule saying “stupid products shouldn’t exist”.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      You’d think so, but who do you think pays huge sums of money every year to be allowed to sell death traps to the public?