• Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    Not accepting israels right to exist is a call for genocide against israel. Israel exists and has the right to exist. You can recognize that and still be against Netanyahus government.

    • mathemachristian@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      It isnt. No settler state has a right to exist, the settlers already there should integrate into the indigenous culture or leave. This includes the US, Canada, Australia and so on.

            • mathemachristian@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 days ago

              For all its faults and crimes, and Lord knows there are many, the country I’m in isn’t oppressing a people native to this region.

              • AwesomeLowlander@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7 days ago

                My point being, go far enough back, and you WILL have found a people or tribe that got wiped out so another group could claim their territory. Where do you (arbitrarily) draw the line?

                • mathemachristian@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  7 days ago

                  Words like “colonialism” or “settler colonialism” serve the purpose of naming injustices committed by empires.

                  They arent just bound to a space but also to a time. So the ongoing oppression against native palestinians, native americans etc is settler colonialism since it is about a people taking land from them without compensation. The roman empire also did settler colonialism. The difference is that the settler romans and indigenous population at this point are indistinguishable from each other. Through intermarriages and cultural exchanges there is not a roman-german and a germanic-german culture. And where there are cultural differences stemming from the days of roman settlerism these now coexist. There is no oppressor-oppressed dynamic anymore that characterizes settler colonialism.

                  • AwesomeLowlander@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    6 days ago

                    The difference is that the settler romans and indigenous population at this point are indistinguishable from each other

                    So what you’re saying is, if one side fully wipes out and/or swallows up the other fully, colonialism is then ok. How is that different from what Israel is currently trying to accomplish? If they succeed, in a century or two somebody would be saying the same thing you are now.

      • Kedly@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        This includes Functionally EVERY state with incredibly few if any exceptions. Whens your line for when a conqueror becomes a local?

        • mathemachristian@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          migration =/= colonialism

          To expand on this, the oppression of the indigenous peoples of these nations is ongoing. Its not in the past its still happening. Thats the line.

    • Squizzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      By that logic the creation of israel was a genocidal act in itself because it created a right for a people to eist where others were existing previously.

      If removing the right to exist of the Palestinian people is perfectly acceptable why is it necessary to keep chanting support for the rights of the aggressor?

    • acargitz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      Israeli jews have the right to life, freedom, safety. They have the right to a home in the Holy Lands.

      They don’t have the right to set up a Jewish supremacist apartheid state to deny the same rights to everyone else.

      The state that they have created and entrenched with genocide and “facts on the ground” no longer has legitimacy to exist in its present form.

      Ending this political entity to create a new democratic one is not genocide by any stretch of imagination.