• RubberDuck@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Meanwhile US defense contractors are probably busy developing bolt on CIWS for their littoral combat ships.

    • Glowstick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      “A close-in weapon system (CIWS) is a point-defense weapon system for detecting and destroying short-range incoming missiles and enemy aircraft which have penetrated the outer defenses, typically mounted on a naval ship. Nearly all classes of larger modern warships are equipped with some kind of CIWS device.”

      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Close-in_weapon_system

      • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Yes, add USVs to the treat list.

        The type of threats these things pose are a lot more similar to missiles than they are to a Rib filled with goons. Low observable and fast, close to shore means that a high level of automation might be needed. Aka… a ciws.

        And why I think there might be add ons, is the type of threat is new and existing systems might not suffice. Magura is armored a plane or missile is not.

        • Glowstick@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Please try not using initialisms that a general audience won’t know. That’s why i had to look up the previous one and quoted the info so other people wouldn’t have to look it up also. USV doesn’t even show up in a googling

          EDIT

          I found it, USV means a drone boat