• PenisWenisGenius@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Let’s take low power a tech gadget that gets good battery life and make it no longer have good battery life. What a great idea.

      • Chemical Wonka@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        The source code is closed so you cannot check Apple allegations only trust them and I don’t trust a company who puts a advertising ID on its phones

        • lepinkainen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Do you trust Google? They do a LOT more than add a highly anonymous advertising ID you can reset at at will.

          Marketing departments around the world collectively shat their pants when Apple did that change, it made tons of user tracking instantly completely useless.

          • Ibuthyr@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            Yeah well, they wouldn’t buy earphones with fucking cameras on them from Google either, now would they?

      • HauntedCupcake@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Only because everyone’s on edge, give it a few years and they’ll need “anonymised” data collection to “help improve their service”

        • lepinkainen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Have they done it with FaceID yet?

          It can detect accurate facial expressions, it’d be advertising gold to see what faces people pull when watching ads, even see if they’re looking at the phone

  • Jesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    And this is why the Humane Pin was always a dumb idea. Apple, Google, Samsung, etc just needed to license some LL and diffusion models, then slap camera on all the headphones they make. Boom - instant humane like experience that’s faster, lighter, better looking, has better battery, etc etc.

    No futuristic projector UI, but that thing was pretty busted anyway.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      The big problem with the humane pin was that it was trying to do processing on the teeny tiny device and that used all it’s battery up in 15 mins generated 300 MW of heat.

      Why not just use the phone in your pocket that’s actually designed for this kind of data processing?

      • Jesus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        As I recall, the original goal was to build a product that allowed you to leave the phone behind so you could be more present in the world.

        Problem is, processing and battery power clearly isn’t there yet, and it would require a separate sim for that.

        A product that leveraged the phone would’ve been a better V1. It’s kind of the obvious conclusion everyone comes to when they play with this thing in the wild.

  • sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Someone correct me if I’m wrong here, but anyone feel like Apple is slowly having an…over-engineering problem?

    The Apple Vision Pro, this… the new iPad Pros with FUCKING M4 CHIPS THAT ARE RUNNING IPADOS (???)

    Like what is happening in their product development department lately?

    • Wahots@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      They need to take their talent and apply it to stuff that could actually use it, rather than rehashing stuff that is already good. An Apple clothes dryer that actually can sense dry clothes and doesn’t break easily. An apple garage door that doesn’t suck. An Apple Ebike that lasts ages and is repairable (and gets people out of their cars).

      I think an Apple bidet could be neat. A toaster, too.

    • Chozo@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      “If you can’t reinvent the wheel, then just make the wheel more expensive.” -Tim Apple, probably

      • lepinkainen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Or they have a ton of M4 sized wheels and it’s easier just to use the same wheel for everything

      • sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Listen, I can’t lie…my iPhone X is the best phone I’ve owned. Bought in 2017 and still going strong with promised support until 2026/27. I still have fond memories of “paying” my parents back for it (I was child labour 😀)

        • UntitledQuitting@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          I bought a 14 pro and gave my nephew my X. Besides the island and the camera quality they are largely indistinguishable for almost all of my use-cases. And they are almost 5 years apart.

  • just_another_person@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I doubt it’s for their fun headset since they’ve already abandoned it. I’m sure it’s going to be taking data for mapping or some other dumb bullshit with AI to describe what’s around you because you can’t fucking use your eyes.

    Apple is so bad now. Ugh.

    • XNX@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Its gonna look out at the world so you can ask it questions and it can tell you about what youre looking at

    • Zier@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yes and tell you your IQ, and notify your doctor that you don’t wash in there.

  • bitwolf@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    The worst part is that these could be the only option. Since airpods are designed to go bad after a few years Apple will interpret all of the replacements as “very successful sales”

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    The $3 trillion company intends to mass-produce revamped earbuds with built-in infrared cameras by 2026, according to a new report from analyst and longtime Apple insider Ming-Chi Kuo.

    The cameras could help Apple shore up its current and future augmented-reality headsets with enhanced spatial audio features, the analyst wrote.

    Citing a supply-chain survey, Kuo indicated that pairing these enhanced buds with Vision Pro goggles could make Apple’s spatial-computing experience more lifelike.

    For folks not interested in dropping thousands on an Apple headset, the IR cameras could offer other perks, including bringing “in-air” gestures to AirPods, per Kuo.

    The analyst’s report follows an earlier story from Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman, which noted that Apple was looking into the idea of camera-powered AirPods.

    After turning its minimalistic white buds into status symbol in the iPod era, Apple has gradually made them smarter over the years, adding features such as wireless connectivity, noise cancellation, head tracking, touch controls and voice commands.


    The original article contains 288 words, the summary contains 157 words. Saved 45%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!