Did anyone read this? It has nothing to do with actual news. The article focuses on isolated incidents like Matvey Volodin’s forced cooperation in May 2024 and his arrest on June 5, 2024, alongside Yusuf’s detainment. These specific dates and sensational stories are definitely not news.
It also violates several rules:
Rule 1: Must be news, current events, or informative articles (past 30 days).
Rule 3: No misinformation or propaganda.
Rule 6: No low-effort content.
I support LGBTQ+ rights, but sensationalism isn’t the way to advance the cause. It’s surprising why this is so upvoted
Doesn’t violate Rule 1 because it was published yesterday. It also talks about things that have happened in the past week. Why are you misrepresenting the article? When we found out that Alito flew flags 2 years ago, should we have deleted all of those articles because it was more than 30 days old? That’s an odd argument but it seems to be what you’re saying, since the article specifies some of these revelations are from the past week.
In terms of Rule 3, you haven’t identified any misinformation. Can you elaborate?
Rule 6 is mostly about off-topic content. If you can identify misinformation, this article might violate 6. But it’s not a meme or anything else referenced in that rule.
Did anyone read this? It has nothing to do with actual news. The article focuses on isolated incidents like Matvey Volodin’s forced cooperation in May 2024 and his arrest on June 5, 2024, alongside Yusuf’s detainment. These specific dates and sensational stories are definitely not news.
It also violates several rules:
I support LGBTQ+ rights, but sensationalism isn’t the way to advance the cause. It’s surprising why this is so upvoted
Doesn’t violate Rule 1 because it was published yesterday. It also talks about things that have happened in the past week. Why are you misrepresenting the article? When we found out that Alito flew flags 2 years ago, should we have deleted all of those articles because it was more than 30 days old? That’s an odd argument but it seems to be what you’re saying, since the article specifies some of these revelations are from the past week.
In terms of Rule 3, you haven’t identified any misinformation. Can you elaborate?
Rule 6 is mostly about off-topic content. If you can identify misinformation, this article might violate 6. But it’s not a meme or anything else referenced in that rule.