• Home routing and encryption technologies are making lawful interception harder for Europol
  • PET-enabled home routing allows for secure communication, hindering law enforcement’s ability to intercept and monitor communications
  • Europol suggests solutions such as disabling PET technologies and implementing cross-border interception standards to address the issue.
  • doodledup@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Can I activate home routing and PET on my phone? Or do I need to get a special SIM card for that? I’m confused about how this works.

  • Fizz@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Good, privacy is why they are being used. The government has plenty of legal ways to invade a person’s privacy, perhaps they should consider using them.

  • Grass@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    man, I do my homelab for hobby and better performance. this is bonus.

    disclaimer: didn’t read the article past the paywall fade out. and I’m too lazy to circumvent

      • Grass@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        you mean like ipsec or vpn? I have been playing with that too for connecting my brother’s computers to my self host services.

    • ulkesh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Came here to pose exactly this. While I support proper and ethical law enforcement, the Snowden leak clearly showed just how unethical my own government is willing to be to enforce laws. So whatever tools I have at my disposal to prevent unlawful search and seizure, I will use them.

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      One of these guys went on to be a very wholesome beloved actor.

      And the other…I assume is still alive.

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        The other one is Keanu something. He was in a terrible film about a man falling down some stairs, I think.

  • Justin@lemmy.jlh.name
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    It’s almost as if police need to get a warrant to wiretap people, and can’t just do illegal wiretaps on unencrypted data. I can see why the EU may want to consider implementing processes for cross-border wiretaps, though.

    • BluescreenOfDeath@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Even if law enforcement can get a warrant, unless there’s a backdoor in the encryption then the data stays private. That’s the whole point of encryption.

      The fundamental problem is law enforcement feeling entitled to snoop on private communications with a warrant vs the inherent security flaw with making a backdoor in encrypted communications. The backdoor will eventually get exploited, either by reverse engineering/tinkering or someone leaking keys, and then encryption becomes useless. The only way encryption works is if the data can only be decrypted by one key.

      Anyone else remember when TSA published a picture of the master key set for TSA approved luggage locks and people had modeled and printed replicas within hours?

      • Justin@lemmy.jlh.name
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        That’s also true. Wiretapping internet communications was more valuable pre-2010s when things weren’t encrypted. It is good that things are encrypted now. There’s still some metadata that can be pulled now from ISPs, such as IP addresses, SNI, and unencrypted DNS, but cops are better off subpoenaing Facebook and Google than trying to wiretap.

  • doctortofu@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Warning: non-transparent walls, window blinds and door locks prevent lawful interception and surveillance - how are the authorities supposed to know you’re not doing something naughty in there?

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      how are the authorities supposed to know you’re not doing something naughty in there?

      Humans are actually supposed to do naughty things. Otherwise they’d be worried about demography

    • j4k3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Clothing hides weapons! So do fat folds. Kill all the fat people and go naked for a crime free world in the new authoritarian bridge between Nazis and Stalinists for a wonderful Europe.

      • vortic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        There are places a skinny naked person can hide things. What do we do about that?

        • j4k3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Kill them all. If your butt cheeks touch in the middle you get the antisemitic/Palestinian treatment. Would you like to die by rocket, bomb, on the hood of a car, as a joke, career suicide, anonymous mass grave, student failure with no future, self emulation, militant untrained police, starvation, Kremlin backed Right faction first world extremist regime mob of fucktards, or randomly one of the above? Heil Europe!

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Oh my! Encryption makes it harder to snoop uninvited into things that should not concern them in the first place! Shocking!

  • SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    That’s going to be a recurring theme. Law enforcement starts scanning one thing, businesses, criminals and citizens start using something else. They’ll have to forbid everything that’s not open, but by then legal businesses stop using the net because all their secrets get stolen.

  • blahsay@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Good. ‘Lawful’ interception is total nonsense. They’d have a camera up everyone’s ass if they could.

    As it is our TVs bloody listen to us…1984 is here.