• parpol@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    4 months ago

    If you want to change the law, you contact politicians, sign petitions, protest in a way that doesn’t prevent emergency vehicles or public transport from reaching their destinations, and you vote during election. If that isn’t enough, you run for office. Doing illegal stuff isn’t justified at all.

    • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 months ago

      Your 8-hour work week was achieved by “illegal protests” among other things. Getting rid of the divine right of kings was “illegal”.

      Setting the world on fire is somehow not “illegal” though.

    • FuzzyRedPanda@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 months ago

      That’s appropriate when you’re trying to change certain things, not everything. When you’re trying to get civil rights or anything else that the higher ruling class doesn’t want you to have, it can and usually does necessitate illegal and violent protesting and uprising.

      • parpol@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I promise you, blocking traffic is not the way to get people on your side. It is detrimental to the message conveyed.

    • solo@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      Of course what you describe is a way of doing things. What you say and what I said are not exclusionary. People can have both legal and illegal approaches on the same topic. Sometimes it is justifiable on moral grounds to break the law, and many countries recognize that need in their constitutions.