They’re using it to fill out regulatory paperwork instead of making sure they satisfy the requirement that you establish actual knowledge about the plant to be built to show that it is safe

From xkcd

Its a huge chunk of the article with nothing from you. And it’s not even marked as a quote. Thats just plagiarism, not a positive.

Because if that’s all there is, and its multi-paragraph chunks, it doesn’t actually foster discussion

Please dont just post cut-and-pastes from the article

Not a bot — just a human who uses a mix of news searches and a curated social media feed, followed by methods like this to find gift links for material I find. I can also read fairly quickly, which lets me go through a lot of material.

If I lived in a congressional district gerrymandered to be under Republican control, I’d vote for the less bad Republican in their primaries. Its a question of doing the best that you can, rather than waiting for the unattainable perfect candidate who agrees with you 100% on everything

Given which publication, just a pejorative

Here’s the thing: He’s way better than any plausible Republican. Work to get somebody better in the primaries, but vote for him in the general.

Other countries have pulled off the same. And they are in fact doing massive wind and solar deployments, so it makes sense

Theyre exempting the Atlantic side of Florida I think, but doing more on the gulf side

No, its about being unwilling to build electric transmission to bring wind and solar power into NYC. This would avoid the need for gas-burning power plants to handle increased peak electric use as home heating shifts to heat pumps

Part of the plan was also offshore wind near NYC, but Trump blocked that for now

Better ad targeting does make ads more valuable…but because only Google and Facebook have the visibility and ML to do it effectively, they wound up with all the ad revenue. Everybody else ended up with a few pennies

I’m a bit sympathetic to them — they do need to get paid to keep operating, and ads don’t cover the cost of providing news anymore

They dont let sites opt-out, and they do a much more seamless job of enabling people to archive paywalled content

Yeah, it lends a lot of credence to the early marine ice-cliff instability work

Archived copies of the article:

• archive.today
• ghostarchive.org

Depends on what temperature we stop at — 2°C keeps most of the ice. Higher temperatures won’t

archived copy of the article

The original language used “mob” instead of “bully-boy” but somebody at the FT thought that was too prejudicial