Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy on August 7 endorsed bills extending martial law and a general military mobilization for 90 days starting on August 12.
I want to hear your justification for posting this specific story, which implicitly criticizes what Ukraine is doing to maintain things in the middle of an invasion, out of all of the stories on that website.
Not at all. Pro-right. That’s why they posted from a blatantly right-wing source by a writer who had really bad credentials about a “study” put out by the Republican-run House Judiciary Committee and challenged everyone who criticized it. It is in the c/news Modlog.
Posting either articles with a biased slant toward right-wing narratives or simply biased right-wing sources.
A source that is not right-wing can still have a bias toward a right-wing narrative. This one has been done for quite some time now- implicitly criticizing Zelensky for doing what should be done in the Ukraine.
You go to their front page and explain to me why that is the story they chose to post out of all of the stories offered if it was not a criticism of Ukraine.
OP: You have already been banned from c/news for pushing an agenda. Please justify posting this specific story.
What you want to hear?
I got banned from there because the admin is on power trip.
You are just rationalizing your nonsense.
If you want to ban me from here, go ahead.
It’s not a crime to post credible news on news subs.
I want to hear your justification for posting this specific story, which implicitly criticizes what Ukraine is doing to maintain things in the middle of an invasion, out of all of the stories on that website.
Do you know how being informed works?
I did not choose only this article, I posted other story from there on other topic:
https://sh.itjust.works/post/23344398
That is not an answer. If you post another source furthering a right-wing agenda, especially an anti-Ukraine agenda, you will be banned.
What is the agenda?
Posting either articles with a biased slant toward right-wing narratives or simply biased right-wing sources.
How is this particular article a right wing slant
A significant portion of their posts is VOA, so I’m guessing pro-US.
Not at all. Pro-right. That’s why they posted from a blatantly right-wing source by a writer who had really bad credentials about a “study” put out by the Republican-run House Judiciary Committee and challenged everyone who criticized it. It is in the c/news Modlog.
RFE is right wing?
I already responded to you regarding that:
A source that is not right-wing can still have a bias toward a right-wing narrative. This one has been done for quite some time now- implicitly criticizing Zelensky for doing what should be done in the Ukraine.
You go to their front page and explain to me why that is the story they chose to post out of all of the stories offered if it was not a criticism of Ukraine.