• daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    183
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    5 months ago

    Maybe that’s not bad for firefox.

    Maybe less money means less ridiculous side projects and just focus on delivering a good browser.

    Algo the lack of google as financial support means they’ll rely more on donations, which would mean that they really need to focus on offering a good browser.

    I’ll gladly donate to firefox if I would see they are really focusing on it.

    • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Maybe less money means less ridiculous side projects

      Like Firefox?

      It really seemed like it’s been a bit of a side project those last few years…

      • 4am@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        5 months ago

        For userland code that basically fingerbangs every server on the web, some forced memory-safety might not be a bad idea

      • Ephera@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        4 months ago

        I really hope that’s sarcastic, because Rust is one of the most valuable additions to the whole IT field in a good while.

        Entire industries have been stuck on C/C++ for decades. Industries, which are normally extremely late to any form of modern software development, are now practically jolting to get Rust integrated into their toolchains.

        Similarly, languages without runtimes allow for building libraries that can be called from other programming languages, which so far meant C/C++. That’s a big reason why many widely used open-source projects like OpenSSL, SQLite, OpenGL etc. are written in those.
        Even if, for whatever reason, you think Rust is awful, getting a third language into the mix will allow many more people to build similar libraries, which is again really good for everyone.

    • Zorque@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      In reality it means they’ll have to focus more on monetization, which will create more enshittification and not less.

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        What they need is to focus on enterprise functionality and privacy services. Maybe they could even do some sort of consulting