• ramble81@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    10 months ago

    /c/fuckcars : “use some other form of transportation!”

    Also /c/fuckcars: “No! Not like that!”

    • Michal@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Why not? Less risk of being hit by a plane if they’re in the sky and requirements for a pilot license are much stricter. In a plane crash occupants are more likely to die than innocent bystanders, compared to cars that are designed for safety only for those on the inside.

      • elephantium@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Why not? Probably because:

        Bike pollution: .

        Car pollution: oooooooooo

        Plane pollution: OOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOO

        (bike pollution is slightly more than nil just because of the CO2 we breathe out while riding)

      • Marxism-Fennekinism@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Unless you live in an extremely remote place not served by roads. The arctic for example. It’s not technically commuting as in going to and from your 9 to 5, but plenty of small northern communities are still completely dependent on small gravel runways or even bushplanes for things like going to the doctor or dentist, or really anything they need to go to a city for, which is a lot of things.

        I actually thought this was a similar situation, that they’re so out in the middle of nowhere flying is significantly more convenient than driving. But then I took a look at the map and realized that they’re not far from Chicago and are within easy driving distance from nearby smaller towns, which makes this way harder to justify though still mildly interesting.

        • oatscoop@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          One of the first things my instructor told me was “I hope you’re getting your license for fun or a job, and not planning on commuting. Eventually you’ll get stuck somewhere due to the weather.”

          Heavy, powerful commercial jets have deicing systems. They also have the benefit of an entire team of air traffic controllers on takeoff and landing – and they still get grounded by weather. Small planes are grounded by such inclement weather as “fog”, “thunderstorms”, “high winds”, and “low cloud cover”.

  • FlashZordon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Must be lovely to hear your neighbor fire up their Cessna at 7 in the morning for their morning commute.

  • Ian@Cambio@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Little known fact. Airplanes still use leaded fuel. I’ll bet that the blood levels for all of these families are elevated. Not a great place to raise a kid.

    • Marxism-Fennekinism@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Clarification: Only piston aircraft require leaded fuel. Which is unfortunately a pretty big part of the general aviation market, but similarly sized turboprops do also exist (though are more expensive) and it doesn’t apply to modern commercial aviation at all.