• umami_wasabi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I’m more intetested how much per kW it produces, and the maintenance cost over its life span. It has to answer the question is this economic to build and maintain, rather a tech demo.

    • SandbagTiara2816@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      This is true, but investing in research and subsidizing its production is how we drive costs down. We’ve done a really incredible job of getting clean energy costs down from where they were, but there’s no need to slow our efforts down now

      • gens@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        AFAIK wind hasn’t changed much in a long time. Not much to improve really. Cost is materials and labour, both going up. Probably still cheaper then coal.

        Can link a video about how they work, and the chalenges tomorow if you want.

  • TIN@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    What part of this don’t you understand? If two turbines is good, and three turbines is better, obviously five turbines would make us the best fucking wind platform that ever existed. Comprende? We didn’t claw our way to the top of the wind platform game by clinging to the two-turbine industry standard. We got here by taking chances. Well, five turbines is the biggest chance of all.

    • thejml@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Sure, we could go to four blades next, like the competition. That seems like the logical thing to do. After all, three worked out pretty well, and four is the next number after three… Why innovate when we can follow? Oh, I know why: Because we’re a business, that’s why!

  • JakenVeina@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    The hell does “single-capacity” mean here? The article doesn’t specify.

    • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      After searching around, I’m somewhat sure that it’s an incorrect statement. The capacity usually measures the megawattage output which is certainly not one. And I found a few older articles that don’t even mention “single-capacity”.

      It has a single mooring so I assume that’s what was meant.

  • Kualk@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    How much energy do they spend to keep this floater in place?