What is happening right now in palestine is the world’s slowest and least effective “genocide”. To put it in context it would have taken the Nazis 4 days of operating death camps to kill more people then Israel has killed in it’s entire 75 years of existence.
It is so slow that at the present rate of deaths in 1000 years there will be more palestinians then there are now. Meaning, that even at the height of the so called genocide the palestinians are not actually under any threat of being destroyed by genocide .
And if there is no threat of actually being destroyed by genocide, there can really you claim that it is actually genocide?
genocide has a very specific definition under international law and “tortured and terrorized” is not genocide. It is torture, and terror.
Do you consider Hamas’ terror attacks and torture of civilian hostages to be genocide against Israel? Of course you don’t. Why? Is it the lack of effectiveness of your genocide that makes you OK with it?
Genocide is an internationally recognized crime where acts are committed with the intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group
The destruction of Gaza and the continued displacement in the West Bank for this definition. Israel is destroying Palestine and the Palestinian people. That definition is from the Holocaust Museum.
An outright instantaneous genocide would bring about too much bad publicity.
Crippling the sovereign functionality of Palestinians along with killing and displacing ‘enough’ of them to prevent them from clawing any of that functionality back is the goal, and that’s what is happening.
Typical fascist doublespeak, the enemy is both too strong and too weak. They are strong enough to do genocide, but too weak to actually do genocide so they have to do a hidden conspiracy super secret slow motion genocide which means will literally never actually finish the genocide they started.
What is happening right now in palestine is the world’s slowest and least effective “genocide”. To put it in context it would have taken the Nazis 4 days of operating death camps to kill more people then Israel has killed in it’s entire 75 years of existence.
It is so slow that at the present rate of deaths in 1000 years there will be more palestinians then there are now. Meaning, that even at the height of the so called genocide the palestinians are not actually under any threat of being destroyed by genocide .
And if there is no threat of actually being destroyed by genocide, there can really you claim that it is actually genocide?
Being forced from your homes; deprived of food, water, and healthcare; and tortured and terrorized is genocide by any definition.
Comparing the effectiveness of your genocide to the effectiveness of Nazi genocide does not help your cause.
genocide has a very specific definition under international law and “tortured and terrorized” is not genocide. It is torture, and terror.
Do you consider Hamas’ terror attacks and torture of civilian hostages to be genocide against Israel? Of course you don’t. Why? Is it the lack of effectiveness of your genocide that makes you OK with it?
The destruction of Gaza and the continued displacement in the West Bank for this definition. Israel is destroying Palestine and the Palestinian people. That definition is from the Holocaust Museum.
An outright instantaneous genocide would bring about too much bad publicity.
Crippling the sovereign functionality of Palestinians along with killing and displacing ‘enough’ of them to prevent them from clawing any of that functionality back is the goal, and that’s what is happening.
Typical fascist doublespeak, the enemy is both too strong and too weak. They are strong enough to do genocide, but too weak to actually do genocide so they have to do a hidden conspiracy super secret slow motion genocide which means will literally never actually finish the genocide they started.
So it’s only genocide, if you redefine genocide to mean “crippling the sovereign functionality” instead of “destroying the people”.