to see that AIs have as many problems as they do with drawing hands.
I can’t draw a hand for shit, but my hand can be traced for one hell of a turkey.
I think that AI is gonna really propel artists to making some awesome weird stuff. AI will be only be able to produce art that already exists or realism. Artists are still going to be the only ones creating new styles, which is going to make their original creations much more appreciable.
Idk bullshit peddler, I can’t get with you on this one. Because I think at the end of the day - anything will be seen as “up for grabs” and illustrators will be on the outs like loomers. And while I am somewhat okay with the idea of rug makers (among other loomable items) being antiquated - creativity should not be because it’s the pulse of human expression for many and if we lessen it/deny it - I think the whole world will begin to taste like corn-flakes.
I saw this growing up in a way, they took our arts program and nobody really found any way to express themselves and at the end of the day where I grew up very few people ever amounted to much of anything =/! I think expression is needed, and must be safeguarded because you need to feel safe to express and must know that it’s a worthwhile venue to venture into. But this is all kinda arm flapping. You can’t stop the future and clearly AI is here to stay - so now we’ve got to work around what we can.
But, by the by - I still love the bs you’re putting down =)
AI will be only be able to produce art that already exists or realism.
Well, that is not true at all.
Generative AI isn’t just limited to imitating or copying existing art. It’s fully capable of creating original pieces, much like humans do. Sure, AI models learn from large datasets of existing art, but that doesn’t mean they’re limited to mere copying. Instead, they take these inputs, find patterns, blend concepts, and can then generate something entirely new. This isn’t too different from how human artists operate. They too absorb influences from the world and other pieces of art and generate new ones based on that. Nobody is creating art in a vacuum.
The additional benefit AI has is not being tied down by existing concepts. Human creativity often gets shaped by cultural trends or personal experiences, but AI can step outside those constraints, giving us a fresh take on art and creativity in ways that many human artists can’t. Not to even mention that you need a human in the loop to write the prompt. AI doesn’t create art alone no more than a paint brush does.
that’s why you use open pose controlnet
As an artist, I can say no, it’s not.
++ I get so bummed out that people who are running models are unabashedly stealing from people left and right and then shrugging their shoulders for their unethical practices. Perhaps pay people for their catalogues at an agreed upon rate or be a disgusting pig and buy from their estate after death. But don’t just come out here and train your models on everything as if it were a free for all and as if creativity amounted to nothing more than fodder for unabashed capitalism =/!
AI is fun to play around with if you are like me with zero artistic talent but currently is no comparison with a real talented artist.
I can’t even draw a bit of spaghetti never mind a hand!
It will make it much more difficult to make a living as an artist, and a less viable pursuit.
It’s already impossible to make money as an artist
