• daq@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      1 month ago

      It really isn’t unless they changed since we used it 5 years ago. It just had a microphone and went through several levels of rocking based on how much sound mics picked up. It worked whether it was connected or not. Internet was just for notifications. Your baby screaming is usually a pretty clear notification.

    • Tinidril@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 month ago

      Doesn’t seem all that smart to me. Does the company offer an API to the device so consumers can write their own “server”? No, I’m sure they have it locked down behind some proprietary encryption scheme so that anyone who tries can be charged with violating the digital millennium copywrite act.

    • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Assuming they need a server at all (and that’s a big if), the computer time needed to handle a crib should be basically nothing. $1 a year would be an exorbitant charge.

      • pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        These things are usually billed on a per-call basis. Costs can rise pretty dramatically pretty fast. Plus, you need to hire staff to manage the resources.

        Sure, you could set up a VPN to your home network and not have to go through their infrastructure, but 99% of consumers won’t do that.

    • nomad@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Welp… Smart designer wouldn’t even have included a server. Bluetooth connection to the crib would have been enough. If it needs an app at all… Our motorized crib hat buttons you know. You are not gonna operate that thing remotely anyways.