• yesman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    28 days ago

    I just want to remind everyone that capital won’t wait until AI is “as good” as humans, just when it’s minimally viable.

    They didn’t wait for self-checkout to be as good as a cashier; They didn’t wait for chat-bots to be as good as human support; and they won’t wait for AI to be as good as programmers.

  • auzy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    27 days ago

    Yeah nah. We already have copilot and it introduces so many subtle bugs.

  • Feyd@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    27 days ago

    Meanwhile, llms are less useful at helping me write code than intellij was a decade ago

    • tzrlk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      27 days ago

      I’m actually really impressed with the auto complete intellij is packaged with now. It’s really good with golang (probably because golang has a ton of code duplication).

  • Vilian@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    27 days ago

    The first thing AI gonna replace is CEO, dumb ass job, Mac Donald employer require more expertise

  • BigBenis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    27 days ago

    Lol, as a programmer who uses generative AI myself, I would genuinely love to see them try.

  • MoonRaven@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    26 days ago

    But you have to describe what it is. If only we had universal languages to do that… Oh yeah, it’s code.

  • CaptPretentious@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    26 days ago

    That guy has never seen AI code before. It regularly gets even simple stuff wrong. Was he especially good is when it gives made up crap. Or it tells you a method or function you can use but doesn’t tell you where it got that. And then you’re like “oh wow I didn’t realize that was available” and then you try it and realize that’s not part of the standard library and you ask it “where did you get that” and it’s like “oh yeah sorry about that I don’t know”.

  • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    26 days ago

    Everyone was always joking about how AI should just replace CEOs, but it turns out CEOs are so easily to lead by the nose that AI companies practically already run the show.

  • Weirdfish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    27 days ago

    20 years ago at a trade show, a new module based visual coding tool was introduced in my field which claimed “You’ll never need another programmer”.

    Oddly enough, I still have a job.

    The tools have gotten better, but I still write code every day because procedural programming is still the best way to do things.

    It is just now reaching the point that we can do some small to medium scale projects with plug and play systems, but only with very specific equipment and configurations.

    • ZephyrXero@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      27 days ago

      20 years ago while learning web development Dreamweaver was going to supposedly eliminate the need for code on websites too. lol

      But sadly, the dream of eliminating us seems like it will never die

  • SuperiorOne@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    27 days ago

    ‘Soon’ is a questionable claim from a CEO who sells AI services and GPU instances. A single faulty update caused worldwide down time recently. Now, imagine all infrastructure is written with today’s LLMs - which are sometimes hallucinate so bad, they claim ‘C’ in CRC-32C stands for ‘Cool’.

    I wish we could also add a “Do not hallucinate” prompt to some CEOs.

  • forgotmylastusername@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    27 days ago

    The sentiment on AI in the span of 10 years went from “it’s inevitable it will replace your job” to “nope not gonna happen”. The difference back then the jobs it was going to replace were not tech jobs. Just saying.

    • Fades@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      26 days ago

      From the very beginning people were absolutely making connections between ai and tech jobs like programming.

      The fuck are you talking about? Are you seriously trying to imply that now that it’s threatening tech jobs (it’s not) suddenly the narrative around how useful it will be changed (it didn’t)