• sirboozebum@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    “I have had no sympathy from any of the accused. One who was HIV-positive came six times. Not once did my husband express any concern about my health,” she said.

    Even if these rapists claims they thought they were participating in some weird sex play, if you knew you were HIV positive, why would you have unprotected sex with anybody?

    Their claims reek of bullshit.

    • ShareMySims@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      if you knew you were HIV positive, why would you have unprotected sex with rape anybody?

      When you use the correct terms, your question answers itself.

      • Impound4017@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        Obviously. The point the person was making was to say that even if we buy into the bullshit narrative that this was consensual, it still doesn’t make sense. They didn’t use incorrect terms to skirt around it, they were making a specific point about their claims.

        • ShareMySims@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          13 days ago

          Except it isn’t obvious to many people, and using the correct language is more important than any supposed point they were trying to make (because part of rape culture is society, and especially the media and the courts not calling it what it is to muddy the water. I’m not accusing OP of doing that deliberately, but that’s why words matter, even if you intention is benign).

        • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          13 days ago

          Sir, this is Lemmy. There are semantic arguments we must beat each other over the head with. I didn’t make the rules…