• grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    Yes, it is exactly the traffic engineers at fault! They’re the ones who sign off on and take legal responsibility for the design! That’s the entire point of engineering being a licensed profession in the first place.

    Let me make this very clear: every licensed engineer has an absolute moral and legal obligation to refuse to sign off on any unsafe design, no matter what some fucking politician wants. Period, end of. And designs that are not Complete Streets, with sidewalks and crosswalks, are inherently unsafe. Also period, end of.

    Every pedestrian killed by the lack of a crosswalk should result in a traffic engineer permanently losing their license and being forced to change careers. It is only through that threat that they will begin to take pedestrian lives seriously!

    • bluGill@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      10 days ago

      How do I copy and paste this a million times in front of everyone. The politicians have intentionally put both all blame and all power on the engineers. The engineers need to use that power to say no. The politicians control the budget and the what they want done, but not everything they want can be done.

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 days ago

      Disregard my other comment.

      What happens to engineers who refuse to sign off?

      Fired? I still stand that daddy boss is ultimately responsible for these decisions but yeah engineers do have professional responsibilities too

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 days ago

        The engineer is the “daddy boss!” Every. Single. Fucking. Time. It is literally the law!

        • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 days ago

          Looks like they do have decision making authority but without budget control that’s kinda “ownership without agency” type situation

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            10 days ago

            Again, that’s what licensing is supposed to solve. The politicians should not have the ability to say “okay if you won’t do [this unsafe thing] then I’ll just replace you with someone who will” because literally every licensed engineer should also refuse to do it.

            Either the project gets built properly or it should not be built. It is every licensed engineer’s professional responsibility and legal obligation to ensure that is the case, regardless of political pressure.

            Capitulating to pressure to build an unsafe design is literally criminal negligence and should be adjudicated as such.

            • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 days ago

              I agree with you 100% but I have so been around the block enough to know that there is the law and then there is practice.

              So figuring out how things are done is best way to make the law work.

              Systems are designed with “good” intetions but in practice we aee that wage slaves even pro grade type are just wage slaves who got families to feed.

              • grue@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                10 days ago

                Look, here’s how it actually works in practice:

                • The politicians approve a budget for a project.
                • The project is managed by the state/county/city DOT, with the project manager being a licensed Professional Engineer (PE).
                • The design of the project is contracted out to a private engineering firm, where the engineer in charge of the design is a PE (and the people working under him who actually do most of the work are either also PEs, or are at least licensed Engineers In Training (EITs)).
                • At least at the firm I worked at, the CEO of the company was also a PE.
                • The construction is contracted out to a private construction firm, where the engineer in charge of construction is a PE.

                Except for the 10,000-foot level budgeting, everyone with a position of authority over the project is a licensed PE. It’s PEs all the way up. The buck stops at the PEs.


                The problem here is not that PEs are being bullied by someone else into not doing their jobs properly. PEs are not victims in this scenario, not even a little bit.

                The problem here is that PEs don’t think they have an obligation to make streets that are safe for anyone but drivers, because the entire industry standards of practice are wrong.

                • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  10 days ago

                  The problem here is that PEs don’t think they have an obligation to make streets that are safe for anyone but drivers, because the entire industry standards of practice are wrong.

                  OK this one landed.

                  Very valid point and thank you for crystalizing this.

                  Reminds of law and medicine tbh. It seem to be a structural issue where proffesions are captured by Brian rot who cares more about money, careers and good connections over doing their jobs.

                  So from that perspective, yes, we should start with people owning this.

                  Thank you for enagaging.