Imagine your car playing you an ad based on your destination, vehicle information—and listening to your conversations.

Ford has patented a system that, per the filing, would use several different sources of information to customize ad content to play in your car. One such information stream that this hypothetical system would use to determine what sort of ads to serve could be could be the voice commands you’ve given to the car. It could also identify your voice and recognize you and your ad preferences, and those of your passengers. Finally, it could listen to your conversations and determine if it’s better to serve you a visual ad while you’re talking, or an audio ad when there’s a lull in the conversation.

If the system described in the patent knew that you were headed to the mall on the freeway based on destination information from the nav system and vehicle speed, it could consider how many ads to serve in the time you’ll be in the car, and whether to serve them on a screen or based through the audio system. If you respond more positively to audio ads, it might serve you more of those—how does every five minutes sound?

But what if the weather’s bad, traffic is heavy, and you’re chatting away with your passenger? Ford describes the system using the external sensors to perceive traffic levels and weather, and the internal microphone to understand conversational cadence, to “regulate the number (and relevance) of ads shown” to the occupants. Using the GPS, if it knows you’ve parked near a store, it might serve you ads relevant to that retail location. Got passengers? Maybe you get an audio ad, and they get a visual one.

Given how consumers feel about advertising and in-car privacy, it is difficult to imagine an implementation of this system that wouldn’t generate blowback. But again, the patent isn’t describing some imminent implementation; it just protects Ford’s IP that describes a possible system. That said, with the encroachment of subscription-based features, perhaps it’s only a matter of time before you’re accepting a $20/month discount to let your new Ford play you ads on your commute.

  • Gork@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Do they not realize this will hurt their Brand?

    Short term ad profits aren’t worth losing customers.

    • De_Narm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      They very much are for a lot of people. Lines goes up, you can give yourself a nice bonus payout and if things come crashing down you leave. With your golden parachute of course.

      • fluckx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I guess they might lose customers, but the ad revenue will offset it. Which could be a win for them. Less cars to produce for the same amount of money. If they survive everybody else will probably just follow suit. Like the car functionality subscriptions.

        I’m just sad we reached this point.

        Ban targeted advertising. Ban data gathering. You won’t even have to deal with the f***ing cookie banners anymore.

      • Wrench@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        In general, digital privacy invasions have been very successful because of attrition.

        Most people don’t care, those that do hold out, but then every competitor does the same and you no longer have any real alternatives. Eventually, the hold outs need to replace [car in this case] and the sting of the objectiknable change has faded, and they just move on.

        Rinse and repeat.

        We lost the fight for meaningful net neutrality, basic digital privacy rights, broadband limits, etc.

        They’ll win this one too. Eventually. Your phones and IoT with microphones are already doing it.

  • Zulu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Honestly good. Let no one else use that technology. Then all i have to do is not buy a ford.

    That said, if you plug your phone into your car, this tech is already in place lol.

      • Grimm665@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        What was that headline about Facebook employees bragging about customer conversations they were listening in on? hmmmm

        • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Choose between:

          Entirely fabricated

          or

          On their own hardware, that isn’t a smartphone, because they don’t make them.

          Both iOS and Android make it abundantly clear when your mic is hot and when apps have access to it. It’s not possible to listen undetected.

          • cirkuitbreaker@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Google Assistant is able to activate simply by the user saying “Okay Google,” at any time, without pushing any buttons first. That means the microphone is always listening.

            • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              You should do your research on how wake words work. They literally are only capable of identifying the selected words and they do an obscene amount of training to do so efficiently, because actually processing all the audio your phone is exposed to can’t possibly be done in a reasonable way.

    • SkyNTP@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      This is not how patents work. At all.

      For one, patent owners are generally more than happy to license their technology to integrators, and even competitors, if there is money to be made.

      More importantly, patents cannot be used to get exclusivity on products. Rather, patents can only protect novel approaches to how a product is made or served.

      The patent system is designed to protect R&D costs exclusively, not some get out of jail card for anti trust. Of course, the patent office isn’t perfect, the system does get abused in anti-competitive ways. But in the end, it’s rare that that results in less consumer choice, because of licensing deals.

      • Zulu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah, the “let no one else use it” portion of my comment is what i meant when you say “patent owners are generally more than happy to license their tech”

        I hope ford doesn’t.

        And yes while patents dont grant exclusivity it gives a company the option to try and argue that a competitors version isnt novel enough. In the USA, where ford is from, patent law screwery is abounds if you have enough money. Of which Ford is backed by the US government.

        Im not here to point out whether or not the patent is the issue. The problem is the spying and selling of personal data. If ford proceeds in a way that limits that exposure to the rest of car manufacturers then fantastic, even if its only in a nominal way.

        I do still appreciate your refresher on how patents work though! Hope the rest of your day goes well.

  • vegeta@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m already sick of ads at gas station pumps, and will just sit in my car in order to avoid them.

    • Kaboom@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s mostly valero pulling this shit. Everyone else seems to have gotten the memo

    • Askundilras@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Ads at the pump? What do you live? Luckily I haven’t seen them in Germany yet. Guess it’s only a matter of time…

    • Telorand@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      One of the buttons around the screen mutes them, in case you weren’t aware. I’ve found that it’s usually one of the ones on the top right, but it can vary.

      • Anti_Iridium@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I swear I’m going to break one of those pumps with how hard I push the buttons on the fucking thing that starts talking to me. I’ll never choose to go to a fuel station with those.

  • MrAlternateTape@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I really hope my car holds out for a long time, because fuck ads in my car. I don’t want my car to listen to anything but the controls I use to drive.

    Is there really anybody who thinks they would like that?

  • OmgItBurns@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    If/when this happens it will just lead to a rise in aftermarket products to disable the feature.

    Hell, since they will probably use AI to parse the audio you can probably use it to fuck with your friends. Like when people would put out hyper-specific FB ads but via cars.

  • fubarx@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    NEW feature: As you drive down the road, Ford cars will automatically take over and drive you to the nearest sponsor location. Hungry? It will take over and swerve into the nearest KFC drive-thru. Next stop, CVS pharmacy, then Office Depot.

    Disclaimer: Disabling AutoAd feature requires monthly subscription.

  • Bookmeat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Give me a free car and I’ll test it out with this “service”. I’m not buying a car that advertises to me.

  • Mobiuthuselah@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Love my 2nd gen Toyota. Runs well. Needs just basic maintenance. It can hold it’s own in any “Made in Murica” pissing contest. And the only annoying thing is the TPMS sensor light, if you could even call that annoying. It’s manual, 4wd, doesn’t record me, no backtalk. As loyal as a truck can be.

  • Bosht@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Of all the amazing futures that technology could bring us, this is the black hell we get stuck with.

    • Kairos@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      It would recognize that you don’t respomd well to ads and play more annoying ones as a result.

  • simonced@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    There was an article saying that ppl don’t buy enough EVs, but with all the shit they put in it, the problem is beyond the type of engine…

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      People don’t buy EVs because they are way too expensive. BS spy devices and features hidden behind paywalls can be put in anything.