Click a link and need to go back 10x to get back. Yes, I enjoy the footballs.

    • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      It’s not for this, of course. It’s because in the world of single page applications built in react and angular where there is no physical back, like no actual server page to go back to just JavaScript, you have to code in what the back button means. Even though there’s no server calls to ask for a new page. New page. Most people still expect that forward and back will still go forward and back in standard navigation.

      Sites like this it’s pretty clear that they just overwrite that with the last 20 calls to their own page, but the alternative is that single page applications would not be able to have forward or back functionality

        • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          10 days ago

          Great I’ll just add a unique guid to each path that is ignored and returns to the same place. You show me a 10 foot fence I’ll show you an 11 foot ladder.

          • hddsx@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            9 days ago

            I mean, I get that. I was making a joke. But 12 ft fence? Load in sandbox and compare html. Your move.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 days ago

      It’s a very “dumb” implementation of a generally useful feature. Browsers don’t keep track of how many times you’re redirected to the same site or try to consolidate the back-button list accordingly, but they certainly could. Wouldn’t be surprised if there was a plugin to this effect.

      • groet@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        10 days ago

        They actually do. To avoid infinite loops. If a URL redirects to the identical URL for more than ~5 times most browsers will refuse to load and show an error instead.

        That’s why sites like this will generate new URLs with the same content.

    • Akasazh@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      What helps with this is clicking links with mousewheeldown, I automatically opens in a new tab. Also MWD on the tab label will close it, so you don’t have to aim for the ‘x’.

      A mouse with thumb buttons is really handy as they do foreward and back, double clicking that gets you out of the issue caused in op

  • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    9 days ago

    This is one of the absolute greatest reasons to support opening most everything in a new tab (as long as you don’t end up like my mom who at one point had over 100 tabs on her phone). Doesn’t matter if it’s a link from the same website, from a search engine, or whatever else there is. New tab.

  • foggy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    Three things.

    1. Yes. Sometimes this is malice. Sometimes this is an attempt to drive impressions and page views.

    2. This can also be caused by poorly configured web applications that update in real time. If, say, some sports website is giving you real-time data about the game as it progresses, a poorly configured web application might be creating a dynamic URL for every change. When you access the older page, it will be instructed to take you to the most recent data, so pressing back is taking you to old data on that page, and then immediately realizing that data is old so refreshing it with the most relevant data.

    3. This is a super common misconfiguration in single page web applications. Domain.com will take you to an application that renders at domain.com/en-us/home. Pressing back takes you to domain.com, and guess what happens next?

    This is basically 99.99% of these cases. I would say if its on some shitty news site with 1000 ads that somehow sneak by AdBlock and UBlok Origin, it’s case 1. Otherwise, it’s case 2 or 3.

    The picture instance is either case 1 or 2.

    • ajikeshi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 days ago

      and neither case provides a service in a state that should be exposed to the outside. Either due to malice or incompetence.

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      Any website managed/developed by someone certified in the last decade or more knows not to do that.

      It’s absolutely malicious, both to drive SRO and to keep “accidental” clicks from backing out so quickly

  • katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    9 days ago

    microsoft does this with their community support/forums/whatever and it’s annoying when you’re trying to look up a problem in google. :///

  • Eiri@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    9 days ago

    I’ve always wondered. Is there really a benefit to a ton of redirects like that? Like, do they gain anything by making it harder to back out?

    Or is it just extremely incompetent website programming?

  • TedZanzibar@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    10 days ago

    You’ve reminded me of a similar frustration that I’ve never found the answer to - though it may be adblock related - in that whenever I open a link to eBay it completely wipes the history for that tab. Or possibly it opens a new tab and kills the parent. Either way I always forget about it until the next time and then it drives me mad all over again.

    • deejay4am@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      10 days ago

      Reddit has been doing this when I click a result from a Google search (yeah, sometimes you have to)

      It’s fucking annoying and I hope whatever JavaScript trick lets them do this gets blocked

      • gh0stcassette@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 days ago

        I use a Firefox based browser and this hasn’t happened to me, are you using Chromium or Safari? Could be a browser specific issue

        • TedZanzibar@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 days ago

          Firefox. I’m fairly convinced it’s something to do with UBO or one of the blocklists but I’ve never taken the time to dig into it properly.

        • Mushroomm@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          Alright lol so long as you understand being forged by the fires of the early internet deems you responsible to be aware of such tomfoolery against us internet patrons. Convince 10 computer illiterate friends to install ublock origin and all shall be forgiven haha

  • TriflingToad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 days ago

    yo honk honk am here to help. Right click the back button to bring up a menu of several previous pages select when it was the search engine or whatever you used before. For Firefox. If you’re on chrome, you can cry. Honk honk, goose out.

    • Mr_Blott@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      Deepl is vastly superior to Translate btw

      Edit - look at these knobends 👇

      This is what’s wrong with the internet now, some wank coming up with a massively niche reason why every comment is wrong.

      Use a mix of both you insufferable fucking plonkers

      • murtaza64@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        Seems cool, but it’s currently missing some pretty important languages (Hindi, Urdu, Thai, Bosnian/Croatian/Serbian, Swahili, etc). I’d put up with something limited like this if it was FOSS and/or selfhostable but it appears not to be

        • Daemon Silverstein@thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 days ago

          Exactly. Also, it doesn’t have Latin (used for both scientific terms such as “Athene Cunicularia”, philosophical such as “Homo homini lupus est”, as well for liturgical and ritualistic texts, especially occult texts) nor Hebrew.

      • Daemon Silverstein@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        While it offers a concurrent alternative to Google translate, it still lacks some features, as @murtaza64@programming.dev mentioned, many languages are missing. In my case, I sometimes experiment with terms across various languages, sometimes Hindi (“O param Devi Kaali”), sometimes latin (“Vita mortem manducat, Mors manducat vitam” is a latin phrase I wrote myself, following Latin grammar rules), sometimes Hebrew (especially for Gematria calculation using numerical values from Hebrew letters (Aleph is 1, Bet is 2, Gimmel is 3, and so on) after translating/transliterating a word/name such as “לילית”). For these kinds of experimentation, DeepL can’t really be of use, so I need either Google Translate or Bing Translate (both support the aforementioned languages).