You might sideload an Android app, or manually install its APK package, if you’re using a custom version of Android that doesn’t include Google’s Play Store. Alternately, the app might be experimental, under development, or perhaps no longer maintained and offered by its developer. Until now, the existence of sideload-ready APKs on the web was something that seemed to be tolerated, if warned against, by Google.

This quiet standstill is being shaken up by a new feature in Google’s Play Integrity API. As reported by Android Authority, developer tools to push “remediation” dialogs during sideloading debuted at Google’s I/O conference in May, have begun showing up on users’ phones. Sideloaders of apps from the British shop Tesco, fandom app BeyBlade X, and ChatGPT have reported “Get this app from Play” prompts, which cannot be worked around. An Android gaming handheld user encountered a similarly worded prompt from Diablo Immortal on their device three months ago.

Google’s Play Integrity API is how apps have previously blocked access when loaded onto phones that are in some way modified from a stock OS with all Google Play integrations intact. Recently, a popular two-factor authentication app blocked access on rooted phones, including the security-minded GrapheneOS. Apps can call the Play Integrity API and get back an “integrity verdict,” relaying if the phone has a “trustworthy” software environment, has Google Play Protect enabled, and passes other software checks.

Graphene has questioned the veracity of Google’s Integrity API and SafetyNet Attestation systems, recommending instead standard Android hardware attestation. Rahman notes that apps do not have to take an all-or-nothing approach to integrity checking. Rather than block installation entirely, apps could call on the API only during sensitive actions, issuing a warning there. But not having a Play Store connection can also deprive developers of metrics, allow for installation on incompatible devices (and resulting bad reviews), and, of course, open the door to paid app piracy.

  • IllNess@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    There are Linux phones available. I,m going to guess popularity of those devices to increase soon.

    • Vik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      As much as I want that to be the case, I don’t think full mobile gnu+Linux is really ready to use daily?

      I haven’t exactly been keeping up with things, mind you

      • kspatlas@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        Just a note, one of if not the most popular mobile Linux distro is PostmarketOS, which is not GNU (it’s based on Alpine)

      • IllNess@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        Yes. I think a huge issue is Linux doesn’t handle other app activities like how Android’s Intent or Broadcast does.

    • helenslunch@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      Linux isn’t even popular on desktop. No way a mobile version becomes popular without some massive shifts in Linux ideology and culture.

    • MrLLM@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      I,m going to guess popularity of those devices to increase soon.

      I don’t want to be pessimistic about it, however I think it’s gonna be like Windows: enshittification will happen, but inconvenience is “too small” for people that they’ll rather check for a workaround than leave the platform.

      My guess is that we need something more appealing like the Steam Deck to make people take the step.

      • vividspecter@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        I’d be happy with 2010 era desktop Linux level of support. It doesn’t need to get everybody to switch, just needs to be good enough for my needs.

      • IllNess@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        My guess is that we need something more appealing like the Steam Deck to make people take the step.

        Hear me out! The Steam Phone®!

        • 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 days ago

          Steam’s UI is tolerable, but inconsistent. In a SteamDeck, OK, but in a phone? Idk.

          I get that this isn’t meant that seriously.

    • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      Sadly the only people who would switch over to an actual Linux phone would be the people like the stereotypical Linux using Lemmy user. The average android user would just continue on like nothing happened because they’re not tech literate enough to know what’s going on or why they should care.

    • XTL@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      There aren’t, really. There are a few antiques and half baked things.

      A big problem is that these days, unless you’re the size of Apple or Samsung, it’s impossible to get a reasonable hardware soc and modem other than one which only runs a soon obsolete blob laden android which is going to be EOL before you’ve even finished your design.

      The hardware is not there. The firmware/hw data/platform isn’t there even to begin OS work with. And there’s a global shipping, regulation and mobile operator hell waiting on the other side. And a product lifecycle that’s only a few years long.

      Yes, I’ve worked for phone manufacturers.