• TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    I mean it’s also socialist, with how it’s developed and distributed. Despite capitalists making use of it too. It’s one of the few things in this world the people truly own collectively.

    • JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      3 months ago

      Capitalists making use of and profiting from socialist programs and structure is a tale as old as capitalism.

      Pharma as an example. Crowdsourced research, government funding with money from the people only to be bought by a capitalist corpo where they do the last 10% of the work by industrialization, jack up the price by 1000x, and take 100% of the profits and don’t even pay back their fair share in taxes, and then get a state-sponsered monopoly for an outrageous period.

  • Lettuce eat lettuce@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    3 months ago

    In my experience, Linux folks are just happy to find each other in the wild.

    Hell, I’m just happy to meet people that are Linux-curious lol.

    It’s mostly online that the distro wars are fought.

  • mogoh@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    3 months ago

    2025 would be the year of Linux, if we could finally agree, that:

    • Fedora,
    • rust,
    • systemd,
    • wayland,
    • pipewire,
    • gtk,
    • Gnome,
    • nano,
    • flatpak, and
    • light mode

    is the perfect stack of technology and configuration and that we do not need anything else. But no, you guys just had to disagree, and here we are …

    • The Hobbyist@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      67
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’m with you all the way, really, except that, truly, KDE plasma and dark mode are the superior choices, obviously :)

      • mogoh@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        3 months ago

        You have just single handedly chased away some potential Linux users and prevented Year of the Linux Desktop 2024! Just with that comment! I hope you are happy now!

      • Sunoc@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Better UI consistency. It’s always really annoying when you have your nice dark theme and a bright white page pops out of nowhere and fry your eyes.

        For ease on the eye, keep everything black on white, and turn down screen brightness if the environment is dark.

    • Krafty Kactus@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      3 months ago

      For most people yes. The only things I would say are more personal choices are nano, Gnome, and light mode

    • pixelscript@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 months ago

      Surprised how, of all the people who took the bait, not a single one of them complained about systemd.

      My beard isn’t long enough to have an opinion about systemd. All I know is all my homies hate systemd for some reason.

      • ColonelThirtyTwo@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 months ago

        A lot of complaints I’ve seen is that it’s bloated - it’s not only a system manager but also has a DNS relay, network manager, container manager, and so on.

        That said, codifying service startup and managing them with cgroups is IMO MUCH better than init scripts that think running killall apache is a good way to stop a service.

    • Vilian@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Disagree on gnome and nano KDE and Micro supremacy

      Fuck light mode

    • kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      Counterpoint it would be the year of the Linux desktop if we all agreed on

      • Artix
      • OpenRC
      • Wayland (but different implementation)
      • pulseaudio
      • non-gnome gtk
      • Hyprland
      • Vim
      • AUR
      • dark mode always
    • kspatlas@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago
      • openSUSE better
      • yes (zig is good too)
      • dinit
      • yes
      • yes
      • Qt
      • cosmic (when it’s done)
      • Emacs
      • flatpaks are good at their job, but I want system packages too
      • dark mode is infinitely better
    • varjen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I will switch to Gnome when it can handle multiple workspaces on multiple displays properly. The fact that I can’t have multiple independent workspaces for each display is a complete deal breaker for me.

    • Sunoc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I beg to slightly differ, but it’s a good take overall:

      • Aeon Desktop or Fedora Silverblue, any sane immutable system, really
      • Zig + Rust + Scheme / Clojure
      • systemd,
      • wayland,
      • pipewire,
      • gtk,
      • Gnome,
      • nano / gedit / whatever y’all are using instead of glorious Emacs
      • flatpak,
      • distrobox
      • light mode
  • AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    3 months ago

    They’re also similar in that if you tell them you use Linux but like Canonical and/or Lennart Poettering they’ll yell at you and call you all sorts of names but if you tell them you’re a Windows user they’ll leave you alone

    • SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Haha, how naive. Snap, systemd, desktop environments, immutable or not, the list goes on. Lots of linux people have strong opinions on some or all of them, myself included. Linux people will never stop arguing over all of those and that is fine. There is choice, there are options, there are different opinions and that is great.

  • umbraroze@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Free Software is Leftism because it has got us great software and maybe the only bad thing I can say is that release schedules aren’t a thing

    Open Source is Capitalist Friendly because, ummmmm, extremely shitty Community Editions and putting everything cool in proprietary side, uhhhhh, random license changes to shit that isn’t actually OSD compliant, unghhhhhh, need of constant vigilance against license violations.

    Like I am happy cheap hardware vendors have adopted OSS components but why are they frequently so shitty about everything

  • mrmanager@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I haven’t seen Linux users fights over distros… Ever. We just have lots of choices, and most of them are awesome.

  • 21Cabbage@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    Was chilling with some friends of friends the other week and operating systems came up and one guy said he ran Ubuntu (I’m on KDE Neon) so we started chatting about that and a guy in the back seat said “Hey, aren’t you guys supposed to be fighting?”.