A massive nuclear fusion experiment just hit a major milestone, potentially putting us a little closer to a future of limitless clean energy.

  • Decoy321@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    82
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    Those are entirely accurate facts, but those downsides are absolutely dwarfed by the upsides to the technology’s potential. It’s like getting your own spaceship, then pointing out that it lacks cup holders.

    • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      48
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I agree, fusion reactors will absolutely revolutionize everything, and even if we can’t do better than tokamak reactors, these problems are still pretty mild. I just expect more from scientific journalism

      • woefkardoes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        11 months ago

        Fusion is a very long term goal and I’m sure they are careful to not tarnish its image. But yes sadly the first commercial fusion reactors probably won’t be sustainable but once they are a reality investment into the technology will be much greater and hopefully cleaner fuels will become a reality.

      • Ben Hur Horse Race@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        it may be that the author knew that if that was included their work would be used by your ben shapiro types to proclaim that fusion reactors create substances that are both carcinogenic AND radioactive!!! and can site their article. not saying thats the case, but I could understand such reasoning

        • jasory@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          I think you are severely overstating the level of knowledge of most journalists. Most science reporting to the public goes like this: journalist hears something, contacts a single scientist in the field, or is contacted by a single scientist. They talk to that person for a few minutes, then write their article. That’s being generous, many simply copy press releases and add their own interpretation.

          There are only a handful of decent scientific reporting agencies targeting the public that actually do a good job.