• Avatar_of_Self@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    It doesn’t really matter because it doesn’t change the point that people think they own digital goods when they don’t. GOG may have a more consumer friendly system in place but it doesn’t change what has happened with people’s music, movies, shows, games and music in games at these digital storefronts, where people have clicked “Buy X” and later on, it’s no longer in their libraries anymore. This has happened even when the business still exists and is still providing digital goods.

    • otp@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      With GOG, you can buy any game, and you’ll have files to keep. Once you have the installer, you can keep that forever.

      Even if your GOG account is hacked, banned, and GOG goes out of business, you can forever install your game onto any compatible machine, even offline, and play the game.

      That’s what GOG does differently.

      It’s like buying a physical game, except there’s no disc. They can’t revoke your access or deactivate your ability to play the game.

      • Avatar_of_Self@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        I know that. That still misses the point. The point of the law is to clarify that on digital storefronts that you make purchases for licensed digital goods, that you can’t imply to the consumer that they actually own those goods. It doesn’t matter if there is an offline installer. It doesn’t matter if you can ‘keep your installers forever’.

        • TheEntity@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          3 months ago

          How does an offline installer from GOG differ from the offline installer provided on a CD/DVD?

          • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            The license for the DVD version is with the actual disk, the license for the offline installer is with the GOG account.

            GOG has essentially created a way to bypass their own licenses, as a feature. And it looks like they won’t be affected by this law because of it.

            • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              They haven’t created anything.

              They just don’t allow games that use DRM (any kind of license check as a prerequisite to run software) on their store. Packaging a game with DRM is an extra step.

                • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  In the legal sense that having DRM-free software does not mean that you’re legally entitled to use it, sure.

                  But checking for a license before running is literally the entire definition of what DRM is. They aren’t “bypassing” anything. They didn’t create technology. They simply refused to allow software that has any type of license check (DRM).