“The Israeli prime minister came here today and said that Israel is surrounded by those who want to destroy it,” Safadi said at a Friday press conference shortly after Netanyahu finished his speech at the UN General Assembly.

“We’re here — members of the Muslim-Arab committee, mandated by 57 Arab and Muslim countries — and I can tell you very unequivocally, all of us are willing to guarantee the security of Israel in the context of Israel ending the occupation and allowing for the emergence of a Palestinian state,” Safadi passionately argued.

Netanyahu “is creating that danger because he simply does not want the two-state solution. If he does not want the two-state solution, can you ask Israeli officials what is their end-game — other than just wars and wars and wars?”

Also, video of the statement.

  • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    That peace only came after one side was soundly defeated and occupied. Not sure it makes for a good precendent.

    • acargitz@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      The Arabs have already been soundly defeated and occupied. Multiple times.

      • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        TIL Israel has defeated and occupied the 57 Arab and Muslim countries mentioned in the article.

        • acargitz@lemmy.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          I’m obviously talking about the Palestinians and the Lebanese, duh. And as far as defeat, yes they have defeated also the Egyptians, Jordanians and Syrians, and a few others.

          • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            It’s not just the Lebanese and Palestinians that we are talking about and they’d have to trust for the guarantees. Obviously the situation is nowhere close to France and Germany post WW2.

            • acargitz@lemmy.caOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              This is raising the bar to a ridiculous and silly level. Are you seriously going to argue for …Algerians, Indonesians and Afghanis being threats? Their immediate neighbours to the south, west and east have normalized relations and are squarely within the Atlantic system. The Saudis and the Gulf states are almost there, too (had it not been for October 7th, this would have already happened). As the Syrians are basically a failed state, the only ones that are left are quite literally the Lebanese and the Palestinians. The influence of Iran hinges precisely on the legitimate grievances of these peoples. Address those, and you got peace. But you don’t have the Greater Israel of the Israeli far right’s wet dreams.

                • acargitz@lemmy.caOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  You were talking about Ukraine and Russia. That’s two neighbours. My comparison is reasonable.

                  • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    I was talking about how neither side actually trusts each other. You were saying with trust peace is possible, but the cause for that peace was that Germany was solidly defeated, occupied and had their arm twisted in the matter. It’s not really the same as what the situation is as of now with Israel and Arab world.