schizoidman@lemm.ee to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agoExported gas produces far worse emissions than coal, major study finds | Research challenges idea that sending liquefied natural gas around the world is cleaner alternative to burning coalwww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square7fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkExported gas produces far worse emissions than coal, major study finds | Research challenges idea that sending liquefied natural gas around the world is cleaner alternative to burning coalwww.theguardian.comschizoidman@lemm.ee to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square7fedilinkfile-text
minus-squarebasmatii@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 month agoThen nuclear is your option, not the option that permanently destroys water tables for billions.
minus-squareRhaedas@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 month agoI believe the biggest source of emissions for nuclear actually come from the construction phase, so getting past that, maybe. Still would be preferable to also reduce energy use so that the “better” source can be spread more efficiently.
Then nuclear is your option, not the option that permanently destroys water tables for billions.
I believe the biggest source of emissions for nuclear actually come from the construction phase, so getting past that, maybe. Still would be preferable to also reduce energy use so that the “better” source can be spread more efficiently.