• kugiyasan@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      You install Steam, enable proton compatibility (on all games or on RL specifically), download and launch the game. Even more chance that it works on the first try with Arch linux-based distro, since the kernel version is closer to the ones running on the Steam Deck.

      If you got the game from the Epic Games store, you download and install Heroic games launcher and proton. In the game settings, you specify the install path of proton and it should be good to go

      • Kraven_the_Hunter@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I don’t see it available in Steam though, only Epic through Heroic launcher. I haven’t been able to get it to work though, just get a black screen.

        • flashgnash@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Have you got your filters set to only Linux native games or something? Little penguin icon in the steam search bar

    • bitwolf@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      You can through Proton still. It still is a Platinum game even though Epic fucked it up

    • flashgnash@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I literally used this as an example to demonstrate gaming on Linux is easy now

      Works perfectly out of the box, all you gotta do is install steam, download it and click play

  • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I am quite disappointed. Given the title, I was like, wow, a generalist PC gaming website recommending people to switch to Linux! Read the article, Linux is not mentioned at all, I don’t even know why it is in the title. Getting a few clicks from hippies?

  • solsangraal@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    the problem is so many office workplaces use windows and google, so unless you want to bring your own computer and buy a wifi hotspot to take to work, you’re stuck on windows and google

  • proceduralnightshade@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    There’s Windows 10 LTSC, which gets security updates til 2027. And IoT Enterprise LTSC, which gets security updates until 2032.

    “But should you even use those versions?!? They are not meant to be installed on a desktop PC/laptop” - idk, it’s either this or Win11.

    For more info on how to install, check https://massgrave.dev/windows_ltsc_links

    • ililiililiililiilili@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      For what its worth: I’ve been running enterprise since 2015 (when it was called LTSB) then switched to LTSC IoT around 2021. Its fantastic and doesn’t have all the Candy Crush and other bullshit. I highly recommend.

      • SailorMoss@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        My biggest concern for using the LTSB IoT is how long third-party application support will remain if Microsoft goes through with dropping support next year. I guess a lot of stuff still works under Windows 7 so maybe it will be fine?

        I don’t expect but also won’t be surprised if it ends up being a Windows XP situation where they extend support for Windows 10 several times.

        • doctortran@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I don’t expect but also won’t be surprised if it ends up being a Windows XP situation where they extend support for Windows 10 several times.

          They absolutely will, and they’re planning on this, they’re just not going to announce the true EOL date. The deadline will scare people into upgrading, then they’ll start extending it.

    • grubbyweasel@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Guys there’s countless tools out there for removing bloat and telemetry and tweaking the UI. it takes like fifteen minutes to make windows 11 completely acceptable for daily usage

      • doctortran@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        The problem is there are many things you can’t disable, remove, or alter, and that will continue to get worse over time.

        Just because some bullshit is listed in Winaero Tweaker or whatever as an option to disable doesn’t mean all the bullshit in the system is listed there.

  • nick@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Pirate a copy of windows 11 N. It’s the eu version that doesn’t have any of this dogshit in it.

    • Troy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Is there a “government” version or similar, where security is paramount? Like, how does MS sell windows 11 to the navy or whatever…?

      • doctortran@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Probably, but the activation of it would be stringent.

        The issue with any Windows OS going forward, no matter what version, is that Microsoft detests local desktop computing now, and so much of it is being ejected to the cloud. That includes all the various methods of managing it for enterprise customers. They’re slowly working towards the Apple model where the OS basically can’t live in isolation. If it touches the internet, it will phone home and kill itself if told to.

      • rmuk@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        For locked-down devices, they’ll be running LTSC or LTSB editions (Long-Term Support Channel/Branch), or Windows Embedded, which are simplified and heavily customisable versions of Windows. For general-purpose devices, they’ll be using Pro or Enterprise versions of Windows which, crucially, support Group Policy. Using GP it is very, very easy for a single admin to configure an arbitrarily large number of Windows machines to work exactly how they want them to work, including configuration options that aren’t otherwise exposed to the end user in any way.

      • zaph@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I got out just before 11 released and had only been on 10 for a year or so. Military moves very slowly at rolling out the latest windows. I’d be extremely surprised if anyone who isn’t a very high rank running 11.

    • FiveMacs@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I just open things in new tabs with the mouse wheel click, then press ctrl-w to close the tab.

      I don’t play their games

  • SteelCorrelation@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m a government contractor, so I’m stuck on Windows and Microsoft products for work. It really sucks, but the government ain’t switching to Linux anytime soon… if ever. At least Windows 11 Enterprise (or Government, whatever) should have a lot of this shit stripped out. I hope.

    • terminhell@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Usually at that scale you create images with all this crap removed. When deployment time comes, the machines are reimaged from local/state IT.

      I feel bad for the average home user that, at this point views more ads than content, and all this telemetry collection to boot.

      • Letstakealook@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I use 11 and don’t see any ads and have telemetry turned off. I’m not sure where this is coming from, but I keep hearing it, and it doesn’t mesh with my experience.

        I’ve personally thought about going back to Linux, and I still might next time I upgrade my MOBO, but the thought of all the effort it will take to get all of my hardware working again is exhausting. That was the greatest struggle before I even approached software issues. I’ve heard it is better these days, but I’m not an expert or a programmer, so I’m essentially relying that someone else has had my use case, solved it, and made it publicly available which is not always the case.

          • Letstakealook@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            That could very well be the case. I was on a beater laptop previously that was no longer functioning with windows and I needed something for school. I remember I that I wasn’t able to get the wifi card to work with Linux so I ended up getting an external card. It likely is different now and I have a proper desktop, but the experience was rough and I’m not eager to repeat it, lol.

  • doctortran@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Last month, for the first time, Windows 11 was a more popular OS than Windows 10 in the Steam Hardware Survey. Of course, this is an imprecise science as people have to opt in to having their machines measured but it’s a sign of wider adoption. Windows 8, on the other hand, never made it big enough to do the same in its lifespan. Windows 7 was a very popular OS and adoption even to Windows 10 was fairly slow initially, partially down to that skepticism.

    You can’t cite the jump from 7 to 8 or 7 to 10 without also remarking on the fact users had far more.control over updates back then.

    Yeah, Windows 11 adoption is up, because most people don’t have a choice, or they didn’t care enough to stop it happening automatically, and don’t know how to roll it back. That doesn’t translate to approval.

    At a certain point, adoption rates just don’t matter anymore because increasingly the user doesn’t have a choice anymore.

  • ChuckEffingNorris@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I keep seeing these " time to move to Linux" threads. For my work I have to use super proprietary software which I know for a fact is Windows only. Not only that it’s GPU intensive CPU intensive and niche. I’m sure there’s a way to run Windows within Linux but I can only imagine the pain in trying to get proprietary shite to work.

    On top of that I need specific CAD software, Photoshop and Illustrator. I don’t think any of these daily used programs support Linux.

    From the outside, Linux just seems like an absolute ball ache to get working with all of the things I currently do without even thinking about it.

    I’d love to do it. Not sure it’s going to work. Am I wrong?

    • smiletolerantly@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      No, you are right. In your situation, Linux is just not an option - yet.

      I think these posts are meant for the 95% of people that use a browser, and maaaaybe a mail client on their PC.

      Photoshop/Illustrator will only ever get ported if enough people have already made the move that Adobe can’t afford to ignore Linux any longer.

      That being said, if those requirements are just for work, what’s keeping you on Windows on your private devices?

      • zeekaran@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        For people just using a browser and mail, they could just use Android. Samsung Dex is pretty great as a laptop replacement.

      • doctortran@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Photoshop/Illustrator will only ever get ported if enough people have already made the move that Adobe can’t afford to ignore Linux any longer.

        I disagree. They have a strong enough hold on the industry they can resist moving to Linux and it will have the affect of choking Linux’s growth.

        Moreover, there’s no way in hell Adobe ever allows their subscription bullshit on a platform that gives the user as much control as Linux. They won’t touch Linux until they can be guaranteed no one will be able to alter or interfere with how their software operates (oppressively).

        The issue with Linux going forward is software in general is all moving towards a more locked down, gatekeeping model. The iOS philosophy is infecting every space, from Android to Windows. Linux stands in opposition to that type of control over the user’s system, and therefore tech companies won’t develop for it if the trend continues.

        • smiletolerantly@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Maybe. But there are third options as well - maybe if Adobe acts like you describe, and there is sufficient Linux adoption, that opens the door for an actual crossplatform competitor.

          Or maybe they change their mind when not doing so costs them money.

    • InFerNo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      If your work requires Windows, then use Windows. Switch to Linux when everything you need is available on it. If alternatives don’t exist, then that’s it.

    • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      FWIW, Photoshop and Illustrator generally work very well through Wine, not sure about CAD so I can’t comment on that.

      In general though, yeah, if you have to use some super proprietary Windows-only software, you very well may be out of luck for Linux. In which case, yeah, you have to put up with Windows and jump through whatever hoops Microsoft wants you to jump through.

    • sue_me_please@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Different OSes for different use cases. You have a job to do. Just use Windows.

      If you want to use Linux, use it on your own machines on your own time.

      That said, there are a few things you can do if you really want to use Linux:

      1. Test if the app works on Wine, Proton, etc. Even GPU accelerated apps can work, depending on the software/driver stack.
      2. Run a Windows VM and pass-through a GPU. That way you’ll get native performance on the app that’s GPU intensive. Use KVM and the CPU overhead will be negligible.
      3. If you’re doing 3D modeling/rendering, SFX, video editing or ML/AI, there are a lot of options on Linux. Some options that exist in Windows also have Linux versions.
      • dragonlobster@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I would like to try #2 but for some reason my 5900x doesn’t have graphics so I literally need to buy a whole other GPU for this

      • RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        For the life of me I cannot figure out how to run KVM locally. Every tutorial I’ve found is targeted at people doing servers.

  • answersplease77@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Stop intimidating folks who just a computer that does work for them with “learn” linux as if linux is a programming language. Many linux distros are super user friendly and work exactly like windows UI.

    Beside, why do you think iPhones, as dumb and as bloated and as restricted and limited and overpriced they are, still are the most selling phones worldwide year after year? It’s because my 80 yr old mom knows how to use it.

    Most people and professionals in the world just want a machine to do their work and are not intrested in learning progamming or command lines to do it. Nurses, doctors and surgeons, non-computer engineers, artists, business managers, …etc, are too busy and occupied to even change the defaut settings or uninstall anything that comes with windows not because they love it but becuse not intrested and don’t care. Add to those groups most, actually all, girls I’ve ever met in my life. They have different hobbies and learning OSes is not of them. It’s like a girl saying “Soon Sephora will discontinue their HilightBrushExfoilioter and everyone who wants to wash their face needs to learn Mac’s DeepBeauty routines”. while dudes are like we know soaps but wtf is an exfoilating routine. Literally, they don’t know what linux is, and it’s not going to sell to tell them to learn.

    So tl;dr: I’m saying the thing that sells would be Pop OS or Mint, or anything that requires the least or none learning curve.

  • kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    As a Linux user this and posts like this piss me off. Linux is NOT and WILL NEVER be a replacement for any other operating system (except maybe Minix). By implying Linux is the same or similar enough to Windows you bring in Windows users who except everything to be the same. Fundamentally thats not a good thing for anyone, Windows users get confused and maintainers are encouraged not to deviate from Windows even in ways that make the OS better (for example KDE not going all in on tiling to appease Windows users). In my option Linux shouldn’t be recommended to anyone. Linux software maintainers should focus on the core Linux userbase and people who want their OS to look and function exactly like Windows/MacOS should just use Windows or MacOS.

    • rekabis@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Well said. Then there is the entire ecosystem of programs and apps for which there is no real ability to install on Linux (and for which tools like Wine will either be buggy or even nonfunctional), and whose absence will just piss users off.

      As much as I love Linux and BSD, it is really only for people who are either mentally geared to shift off of Windows or whose minimal needs won’t notice the difference; it is not a drop-in replacement for Windows.

      For example, my octogenarian father has exactly such minimal needs except for one program: Quicken. Any bugs or issues running that as an installed desktop program on Linux would have him enraged and throwing the PC out the window. So he is still on Windows, and I am keeping my eyes open on how to properly neuter/excise Copilot once it drops.

    • Flatfire@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      This is…kind of stupid? There’s such a plethora of options in the Linux space for desktop environments, workflow customizations, configurability, etc. nothing is locked down by taking a Windows-style approach to a DE. Instead it follows a tried philosophy that’s only really been hampered by Microsoft’s decision to funnel users into an frustrating hole that removes the choice to disable or modify features you don’t like. KDE in particular has always been a Windows-style DE, and it’s currently one of the best options for modern features and extensive customizability. Hyprland is literally designed for linux enthusiasts. Gnome is the Mac analog, Xfce is your light-weight but functional, etc.

      You’re upset because people are looking for more options? That’s bizarre. I came from Windows, but I guarantee my setup is different than someone else who comes from Windows because that’s the flexibility that’s offered. No one coming from Windows wants it to be exactly like Windows, they just want to be able to use their computer in a way that allows them to work, to play games, to watch media, etc. It’s a computer. It’s your computer. It should be able to do what you want.

      • kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Thats absolutely untrue, I see people complain all the time “Linux doesn’t look exactly like Windows therefore its not polished” or “Linux doesnt support every Windows app therefore its not ready”. When Linux users keep saying “Linux is a Windows replacement” or even implying it by suggesting it as an alternative to Windows 11 it creates expectations that can never be met. In addition im frustrated not because Windows users demand more options but because they demand less options. They demand one distribution to be “the Linux OS”, one singular desktop, and one way of doing things. Fundamentally when Windows users come in expecting Windows they have a Windows mindset.

        • Flatfire@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Ah, my bad. I think I misunderstood your point and took you to be gatekeeping rather than just attempting to defend against misinformation or poor comparisons.

          You’re right, it’s not a Windows replacement. It shouldn’t be expected that it’s analogous to Windows. My previous statement was coming from the expectation that people moving from Windows to Linux as their primary OS of choice was that they were explicitly looking for the advantages offered by it, rather than simply expecting to get away from Microsoft while needing to adjust to nothing new.

          • kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Ideally new Linux users would accept that things are different and we are starting to see it. Tiling window managers are gaining popularity especially with the announcement of the first true tiling (or rather dynamic) desktop environment (Cosmic). I think it would also be helpful if Linux users explained why things are different, sometimes its a lack of support (HDR, VRR, VR, etc) but sometimes like with anticheat there are good reasons for the absence. In addition the problem is that a significant amount of people want a “non-microsoft windows”. The solution is simple, people should view Linux in a way like MacOS (some windows apps don’t run but it has plenty of exclusive apps that don’t run on Windows).