I don’t mean double-wides, I mean quality modular houses.

  • bluGill@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 days ago

    Why? there isn’t much difference in cost possible as site built is mostly using pre cut materials as well.they go up faster but don’t save that much when you demand quality. They also are very limited in floorplans. Anyone actually in construction understands where the real problems are and they are not things modular can solve.

    • someguy3@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 days ago

      Buh? Site has a ton of on site construction: woodwork, running wires, pipes, fucking everything. Prebuilt in a factory can get way more efficiency.

      • bluGill@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        16 days ago

        All that is done in the factory too. Done in much the same way.

        Site built just brings the factory to the site and gets semilar efficiencies.

          • bluGill@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            15 days ago

            People hate it when all houses are the same and that limits what eificience you can get.

            • someguy3@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              15 days ago

              Just like different car models you can have different house models if the market is big enough.

              • bluGill@fedia.io
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                15 days ago

                shipping a complete house is expensive. site construction is very efficient and well setup for quick building with minimal people. And because you don’t have to design for what can fit on roads ends up almost as cheap while being more flexible-

                i’m not arguing that site built is just as cheap only that it isn’t much more expensive and the other benifits make it worth it.

  • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 days ago

    There really outts be a hurricane-proof trend, like dome houses, and for the coastline, domes on stilts.

  • grandel@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 days ago

    I was hoping for a trend in less green house gases but this sounds like the next best idea.

  • Blaster M@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 days ago

    If you can make modulars out of concrete instead of balsa wood that would be great. Otherwise, bring on the shipping container houses…

    • someguy3@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 days ago

      Shipping container houses are terrible ideas. You want insulation, windows, plumbing, etc. They don’t work well in those small steel containers.

      • Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        14 days ago

        "It is possible to insulate the outside of a shipping container instead of the inside.

        This method of insulation is known as “over-cladding” or “external insulation” and involves adding a layer of insulation to the outside of the container before covering it with cladding or other weather-resistant materials"

        • someguy3@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          14 days ago

          Seriously? It’s surface area to volume problem. You have this tiny box. And then you have problems with doors, Hvac, etc. Sorry but the whole idea is idiotic.

          • Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            14 days ago

            People just want affordable homes- a cornerstone feature of pretty much every modern generation before Millennials.

            Obviously there are better ways to build a home, but those avenues seem closed.

  • ashok36@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 days ago

    Modular or not, when there’s 10-12’ of storm surge and/or river flooding, it doesn’t matter. Houses built today generally handle cat 3 and even cat 4 storm winds without much problem. It’s the flooding that’s the killer.

  • ultranaut@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 days ago

    People have been trying to make modular housing work for awhile, with limited success. For various reasons, it’s a lot more challenging than it seems like it should be. One of the problems is that the US doesn’t really have a single national regulatory regime for building codes, they are mostly local and regional. You can’t really design a house that works everywhere so the economics are a lot different than selling something like a car or a washing machine.

    • someguy3@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      16 days ago

      I think a large part of it is consistent demand, and that must be regional because of the size and shipping of the final product. Hurricanez solve both to some extent.