Another angle:

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      25 days ago

      Speed matters more than mass when calculating kinetic energy. A 767 is much, much faster than a B-25.

      • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        25 days ago

        While you’re right, the MTOW of a B-26 is around 17 tons, the 767 is 150-200 tons.

        So there is a factor of around 10 between them, so if the 767 flies 3 times as fast - which it doesn’t, the B-26 cruises at more than 0.35 Mach at close to sea level, and the 767 is not supersonic - that means that the factor from the speed can’t be more than about 3 squared, so 9.

        So the factors from the weight and the speed are roughly equal IMO.

      • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        25 days ago

        Speed matters more than mass when calculating kinetic energy.

        Are you sure about that? An air rifle shooting supersonic aluminum pellets has considerably less kinetic energy than a .22 LR bullet, because of the weight of the bullet. Some air rifles actually shoot their projectile faster than a .22, but they have like 10x less energy upon impact.