• RatzChatsubo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    That’s why I used Kodi, a Plex server, and modded youtube. Fuck ads and fuck subscriptions

    • hobovision@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Plex has started to enshittify as well. I switched to jellyfin because Plex had features behind pay walls and kept going “oops I accidentally changed your settings so you have to look at the plex home screen with ads for our streaming service”.

    • ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Fuck ads and fuck subscriptions

      How do you imagine developers and content creators to get paid if neither of these two options is acceptable to you?

      • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        Am a developer, please do not pay for any software subscription if you don’t think it’s worth it.

        Us devs would love to give the best experience, but if the customer is willing to pay for a shit experience, guess which path management makes you take.

        • ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          Ok, but ‘fuck subscriptions’ is a blanket statement directed at the subscribtion business model as whole, including the hypothetical well run, and non-greedy ones.

      • Teppichbrand@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        FUCK CONTENT, LET ALL THE MINDLESS DISTRACTION DIE, WE’D BE BETTER OFF IN THE STREETS, SPENDING TIME TOGETHER, BUILDING SOMETHING, ACTUALLY TALKING TO EACH OTHER!
        Says a tiny edgelord in me. I would never write something like this, I’m an adult.

      • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Pay por the permanent ownership of the sold product.

        As they say. If selling isn’t owning, piracy isn’t stealing.

        If a seller doesn’t give me option to own their products I will certainly never steal them.

        • ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          But how do you apply this to a platform like YouTube? I don’t want to have to buy each video I watch.

          • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 days ago

            Sell “seasons”.

            Put a prize on all videos released during each year. But once that’s paid I can have those videos forever.

            No point on having to pay a monthly subscription forever to watch a video made 10 years ago from a youtuber that’s no longer active (maybe even alive).

      • Bronzie@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        Honestly mate, I am not a tankie or even politically left in my country, but when looking at the insane results for these enormous companies and the ever increasing greed with ads/price hikes, I’ve just had enough.

        I know it’s not morally right to steal, but I refuse to support companies like Alphabet paying their CEO 200+ million a year. If they manage to block me out when skirting their ads, then I’ll find something else to spend my time on.

        So you’re right, I just don’t care anymore.

        I do pay for Nebula though!

        • Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          100%

          Your local library usually has a host of FREE media types. Including regular ol books, which thankfully still remain ad-free.

          (But also movies, and digital readers, and news articles, etc).

          • RatzChatsubo@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            It could if they actually let you download the content for a change.

            And no I mean original quality, not split up undecipherable files that are hard to organize outside of their platform

            • ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 days ago

              I tend to feel that if it’s a streaming service providing access to a wide range of videos, it could be argued that you don’t own them and, therefore, can’t download them either. However, you could still have the option to pay extra to actually purchase the video too. That money should go to the creator, though, who, of course, would also set the price. That could be free too. I, for example, have no issue with people watching my car repair ‘tutorials’ on YouTube for free.

              • RatzChatsubo@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                Man Google had it just right with Google music and books. Of course they threw it all away.

                I was a big fan of Google music because I was able to upload my own music on to the cloud and they would help me tag albums. The streaming of new music was just the cherry on top and it was awesome when Google told me to check out a new album based on what I uploaded previously. Not only that, but they let you pay for music that you wanted to keep offline as well.

                Now it’s all crammed into YouTube, which is horrible for music as it was never designed for music anyway

                To this day, I still think this was the best compromise all around and it seemed very ethical and modern to the way we consume music.

    • Steamymoomilk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I chatted with my uncle recently, and he told me about a movie from 2006. I asked where to watch it, he said you can watch it free on YouTube. Stop by my parents house, we decide to watch movie. It was 1 hour and 30 minutes, Runtime. There was 3 minute ads every 10 minutes. The movie was good, but heavily dampered by ADS. To the point you would start to get invested and zone into the movie. Then BAM ADS, the only other option was to buy the movie for $4 on prime or pay for a hulu subscription.

      I know subscriptions are stupid and i agree, but its just so infuriating! Pay $7.89 for streaming service which may or may not have the thing you want to watch. For it to most likely to be on streaming service B. Or you go buy the DVD assuming you can. Which now you own a movie that may be CRAP.

      You just cant ethically win :/