Here’s a copy and paste from the 1933 article:

Rise in Stocks Reflects Confidence He Will Not Disrupt Nation’s Affairs

Berlin is settling down to pass judgment on political developments. Politicians, economists and bankers declare there is usually wide discrepancy between the speeches of opposition politicians and the actions of the group when it gains power.

Consequently, it is not believed that Hitler will accomplish a change in the constitution or that [Reich Minister of Economics Alfred] Hugenberg will bring about a general reduction of interest rates. The government wants to obtain an adjournment of the Reichstag for several months, but it is questionable whether the Centre [Party] will approve of such action. 
  • Turbonics@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Turning up the controversy to 11: there is a double standard in people blaming other religions for everything but not allowing criticism of Judaism. Even on Lemmy people will gladly insult Islam and Christianity but criticism of Judaism is a taboo.

    This is a good recent video pointing out how far the double standard goes https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=taIyXzFx2oo

    I do agree that there is no real benefit to using the term Judaism for Israel. Zionism has created their own subsect which is a nation-state movement rather than a religion.

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Yeah i never get this clown responses when i shit on islam and catholic church being pedophiles… but god forbid country of war criminals get closed for what they are.

      Are we supposed to ignore that that this genocide is ethnic/religious flavour to it?

    • drake@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      That’s interesting, I wonder if there’s some historical precedent that may make people slightly more concerned about anti-semitism rather than anti-christian sentiment.

      Fuck all religions, criticise Judaism all you want. But if you start talking about jews (or Christians or Muslims) as if they’re some sort of monolithic group, you’re being an asshole.

      Edit: Holy shit, I watched the first 10 seconds of that video and the guest said “Jewish supremacy is the biggest threat to the world today”, which is one of the most overt, outrageously anti-semitic statements I’ve heard in the 21st century. Whoever that guy is, he should not be allowed on TV or YouTube, holy fuck.

      • Turbonics@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Okay now continue watching the rest of the video and do keep that outrage you had about Judaism in the back of your mind.

        See if you have that same outrage when guests on Piers say similar things about other religions as the presenter shows examples of.

        • drake@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 hours ago

          There’s no way I’m watching any more of that absolutely disgusting bile. I hate Piers Morgan, he’s a horrible, racist, piece of shit. I’m just as outraged about people being islamophobic. People being islamophobic doesn’t mean that we should accept anti-semitism, what kind of backwards argument is this?

      • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I wonder if there’s some historical precedent that may make people slightly more concerned about anti-semitism rather than anti-christian sentiment.

        Yes, genocide only happened to the jews, no other group has ever suffered either…

        The entire WW2 history is not being used to excuse genocide conducted by Israeli jews.

        People are dying but you are buthurt because criminals being named lol