• Nighed@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      25 days ago

      Or things like aluminium smelting/electrolysis.

      On crypto, if it’s green energy and there is enough of it, what’s wrong? (It’s not great, and a waste of hardware, but not as awful)

      • moonlight@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        25 days ago

        It’s a waste of hardware, and a waste of energy that could be doing something useful.

    • GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      25 days ago

      Steel, aluminium and battery production can also make good use of lots of cheap renewable energy.

    • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      25 days ago

      Fuck bitcoin. It should be allocated to desalinisation so less water is pulled from the rivers of the driest continent on Earth. The ecology around waterways is already in the shitter, and global warming is going to 10x that clusterfuck.

      • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        25 days ago

        That is a good option too. How long does it take to spool up or ramp down desalination? I mentioned Bitcoin mining because it’s super fast to come online or go offline depending on the energy requirements at the moment.

        • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          25 days ago

          I doubt that would be terribly relevant. The lions share of the surplus energy should be predictable based on recent grid data + 24 hour weather forecasts.

          Based on nothing but wikipedia the primary methods for desalination are distillation (boiling) and membrane; neither of which sound like ramp up time would matter.