• mosiacmango@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    20 days ago

    End to end is end to end. Its either “the devices sign the messages with keys that never leave the the device so no 3rd party can ever compromise them” or it’s not.

    Signal is a more trustworthy org, but google isn’t going to fuck around with this service to make money. They make their money off you by keeping you in the google ecosystem and data harvesting elsewhere.

    • zergtoshi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      19 days ago

      Signal doesn’t harvest, use, sell meta data, Google may do that.
      E2E encryption doesn’t protect from that.
      Signal is orders of magnitude more trustworthy than Google in that regard.

      • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        19 days ago

        Agreed. That still doesnt mean google is not doing E2EE for its RCS service.

        Im not arguing Google is trustworthy or better than Signal. I’m arguing that E2EE has a specific meaning that most people in this thread do not appear to understand.

    • MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      19 days ago

      End to end matters, who has the key; you or the provider. And Google could still read your messages before they are encrypted.

      • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        19 days ago

        You have the key, not the provider. They are explicit about this in the implementation.

        They can only read the messages before encryption if they are backdooring all android phones in an act of global sabotage. Pretty high consequences for soke low stakes data.

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        19 days ago

        Yup, they can read anything you can, and send whatever part they want through Google Play services. I don’t trust them, so I don’t use Messenger or Play services on my GrapheneOS device.

    • 𝕽𝖚𝖆𝖎𝖉𝖍𝖗𝖎𝖌𝖍@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      19 days ago

      End to end could still - especially with a company like Google - include data collection on the device. They could even “end to end” encrypt sending it to Google in the side channel. If you want to be generous, they would perform the aggregation in-device and don’t track the content verbatim, but the point stands: e2e is no guarantee of privacy. You have to also trust that the app itself isn’t recording metrics, and I absolutely do not trust Google to not do this.

      They make so of their big money from profiling and ads. No way they’re not going to collect analytics. Heck, if you use the stock keyboard, that’s collecting analytics about the texts you’re typing into Signal, much less Google’s RCS.

    • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 days ago

      They do encrypt it and they likely dont send the messages unencrypted.

      Likely what’s happening is they’re extracting keywords to determine what you’re talking about (namely what products you might buy) on the device itself, and then uploading those categories (again, encrypted) up to their servers for storing and selling.

      This doesn’t invalidate their claim of e2ee and still lets them profit off of your data. If you want to avoid this, only install apps with open source clients.

      • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        19 days ago

        E2EE means a 3rd party cant extract anything in the messages at all, by definition.

        If they are doing the above, it’s not E2EE, and they are liable for massive legal damages.

        • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          19 days ago

          Thats not what it means. It means that a third party cannot decrypt it on their servers.

          Of course if the “third party” is actually decrypting it on your device, then they can read the messages. I dont know why this is not clear to you.

    • CatLikeLemming@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 days ago

      Note that it doesn’t mean metadata is encrypted. They may not know what you sent, but they may very well know you message your mum twice a day and who your close friends are that you message often, that kinda stuff. There’s a good bit you can do with metadata about messages combined with the data they gather through other services.