“In this threat environment with the increased attacks on public officials, it’s surprising that a CEO of a major corporation would walk around with no security at all," said Don Mihalek, a retired senior special agent for the U.S. Secret Service and an ABC News contributor.
Retired FBI special agent Richard Frankel, founder of RMF Crisis Management, said he received several calls from companies within hours of the shooting looking to reevaluate executive security.
“Some already have security and so they are deciding if they need to increase it, and others who have not had security are saying, ‘Do we need to have some security, or do we need to have at least a policy regarding security in place?’” said Frankel, also an ABC News contributor.
If you’re an executive and think you need security, you don’t need security.
You need to resign.
A handsome, charming, and mysterious figure suddenly has every villainous capitalist in the country checking over their shoulder, and racing to staff their facilities with enough stooges to hold this phantom off long enough for them to load their billions into their rocket ships and flee.
Real life has become an ideology-bent spy thriller and I’m only slightly ashamed to be fully caught up in the intrigue.
Death to the bourgeoisie!
Maybe they should investigate why so many Americans are clapping for the guy who shot a CEO
Everyone is just assuming that he was killed on behalf of a disgruntled (or dead) customer. But it could have been another rich person killing him for rich people reasons.
The words on the bullets seem designed to make very clear why he was killed.
Security upgrades are something they can do on day 1. Real changes aren’t going to be as easy
