Suck it micro USB, mini USB, and lightning! 🪫🔋

  • uis@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    Only suck it lightning. It still allows standard chargers like micro USB and mini USB

  • Walican132@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    My only concern with this law, is that what happens when USBC is no longer the best option. Idk how to express what I’m saying but what if USB-G ends up being 1000x as fast. Does this law allow for chargers to evolve and if so, how? I admit I haven’t looked into this but I’ve been wondering about it.

    I’m 99% wireless these days so I wouldn’t be surprised if chorded chargers are largely on their way out, but I’m still curious.

    • Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      I’m 99% wireless these days so I wouldn’t be surprised if chorded chargers are largely on their way out, but I’m still curious.

      How fast is the wireless charging these days? I’d be surprised if it’s anywhere near the higher USB PD 3.1 modes.

    • uis@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      Law does not forbid having multiple charging ports.

    • Farid@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      USB-C doesn’t have speeds, it just a connector type. USB 1, 2, 3-3.2, 4 etc. is the protocol responsible for speed. You can have a USB-C connector with any implementation (except maybe USB 1). It can even do DisplayPort stuff.
      So for USB-C to become irrelevant we need to come up with a better connector form factor. Which is unlikely to happen soon. But also, same thing happened with USB-B Micro connector (colloquially called micro USB), it was designated as a standard (but Apple managed to get an exemption) and manufacturers had no issues moving to a better connector, which is USB-C.

    • 💭 ᴍɪɴʏᴀᴇɴ@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      Fair. I only use cables, but my assumption would be that they would adapt to new standards. Which is effectively what this is doing to standardize it, IMO.

    • aaron@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      Completely fair to assume that the complete fucking idiots who create these laws don’t have the faintest fucking clue about what they’re doing would know what they’re legislating, but no! This law certainly doesn’t anticipate advancement. And why would it? They’re complete fucking idiots. Great question.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        14 days ago

        If you don’t know the answer it is of course perfectly acceptable to just not provide one.

    • iii@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      I don’t think that will occur, because what’s the point of developing USB-G if you’re not allowed to use it in a product?

      • Laurel Raven@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        14 days ago

        Why wouldn’t they be allowed to use it?

        Computers have room for multiple ports and is where a new standard would crop up anyway even without the law, just like where USB-C started out.

  • AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    Now if only we can standardize cables or at least labeling. We went from everything working wherever it would plugin to everything plugging in but who knows if it will work

      • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        13 days ago

        The very same. I saved a few dollars here and there which I would be more than happy to trade for some decent regulations on the things I buy.

        What’s funny is that I still got taxed for the expensive stuff I bought, just not a few take out orders and one toy I bought. Success?

        • uis@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          13 days ago

          I heard your grocery stores just increased prices to match previous post-tax prices.

  • narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    With the iPhone 14 no longer being sold the specs of the rumored SE 2025 make a lot more sense.

  • ad_on_is@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    Can we bring back the charging as well, and not just the USB cable… Oh, and while you’re at it, screws instead of glue, to replace batteries would be awesome.

    Thx!

      • ad_on_is@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        while 2027 is better than nothing, I still wonder why it took them so long. Glue in smartphones has been around for probably a decade now.

        Also, I think, anything that has a battery, should be user replacable… even teeny-tiny earbuds.

        • RacerX@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          13 days ago

          Totally agree! It’s seemingly gotten worse recently too. My phone is 5 years old and I was still able to replace the battery at home but it took special tools and a hair dryer. The newest Pixels and Galaxy phones look impossible to do with my current skillset.

          Things like Fairphone and the HMD Skyline should be the norm going forward.

          • ad_on_is@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            13 days ago

            For USB sure… it’s kinda “newish”. But, I mean, they could’ve intervened much sooner, when glue became the standard for assembling phones.

            • Nollij@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              13 days ago

              The delay on USB was to let the industry standardize on its own. The EU hinted to all manufacturers that they needed to standardize. Then it outright stated. Then because Apple was run by pricks, the EU had to legislate USB-C to force it.

              Now, when something better comes along (like when mini USB gave way to micro USB, then to USB-C), there will need to be new legislation to allow that connector.

      • weew@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        Noice. I am definitely waiting until 2028ish before upgrading my phone, if not a bit longer.

    • GooseFinger@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      Literally in the article brief and in the second paragraph: “Electronics manufactures must from Saturday fit all devices sold in the EU with USB-C charger ports…”

  • WhatSay@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    The benefit is that by being standardized, there will be less proprietary cords and adapters. And the capability of USB-C should be adequate for sometime with the power and data transfer.

    One issue, is that not all USBC cords are of the same quality. I found this recently when trying to find a cord that can be used for an external SSD, and video for a monitor. Some cords worked, the rest did not. All the cords could be used for charging, but after that, all bets are off.

    • Baku@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      I bought a really nice, high quality, very fast charging and data transfer cable, and there’s one device I own that it will not charge at all. My assumption is that it probably doesn’t have a charging control chip or something else required to work with that cable. It doesn’t work with any other USB-C to C cables I own either. It has to be charged with the USB-A to C cables included in the box

    • somenonewho@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      The problem is that USB-C is a plug not a standard even in charging some cables won’t do as much power as others (though at least they communicate that to the power source).

      I do however fully support the total USB-C rollout. In my everyday carry there’s now only one plug (2 USB-C one USB-A) and some cables that I can charge everything with, my laptop, my phone my Powerbank and even those few devices that are still USB-B micro (I just carry one USB-A to micro cable).