• BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Yep.

    Telegram is a decent middle ground. UI/UX matters, I’m not sure how the folks at Signal are completely missing that point.

    The Signal UI is OK, as a competitor to SMS. But it’s terrible compared to Telegram. This matters to non-technical people, it’s how you get them to use it. Plus the seamless connection between devices - that’s crucial. I can chat using whatever device is in front of me.

    • Mentando@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Just out of curiosity, since I am fine with the Signal UI/UX: what would you say are the top features that make Telegram better?

      • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        I’m guessing you’ve never seen Telegram? It looks like a modern messaging system.

        This is a screenshot: https://dribbble.com/shots/12242096-Telegram-Messenger-Free-Download

        While Signal looks like any generic SMS app. Heck, both NextSMS and Textra look as good/better and have more “features” (interface customization).

        As a technical person who cares more about functionality that stuff doesn’t matter much to me, but it’s easy to see how a typical user would perceive them (and honestly, the difference is so great it even affects me).

        Signal looks dated, like SMS, Telegram looks (and behaves) modern.

        • Zak@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          That doesn’t appear to be a screenshot of Telegram, but of a designer’s portfolio piece example redesign of Telegram.

          It doesn’t look anything like Telegram for Android, though a quick look at real screenshots suggests it’s more similar to Telegram for iOS.