• Telorand@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    26 days ago

    YDI.

    It’s genocide by any other definition. You can split hairs all you want and call it “crimes against humanity” or whatever, but it’s a distinction without much difference when we’re talking about targeted missile strikes upon schools, hospitals, and apartment buildings. Pedantry isn’t going to convey some nuance that people are missing, and the mods were right to put a stop to it.

    • Majorllama@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      26 days ago

      If making targeted strikes against specific structures is grounds for calling it a genocide then what does launching 10,000 unguided rockets randomly into who-knows-what in a single day count as?

      I hold the incredibly unpopular opinion that both sides have been absolutely terrible for a long time so don’t come at me for picking a side. I am genuinely curious if you consider both of those acts of aggression as a genocide or not based on your own listed definition.

    • bestboyfriendintheworld@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      26 days ago

      a distinction without much difference

      To you his might not matter. Words, especially legal terms under international law have actual definitions.

      If it doesn’t make a difference why ban people?

      • Telorand@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        26 days ago

        Because you’re playing pedant with people’s lives to stroke your own ego and/or prove that you’re the smartest one in the room. Meanwhile, people make those same arguments to try to discredit anyone who says the IDF and Netanyahu are killing civilians on purpose, that they’re killing women and children with abandon, that they’re committing war crimes like they’re going for the high score.

        Perhaps you don’t have malicious intent, but you should at least recognize that you sound like someone with an agenda and haven’t conveyed a take that they haven’t all made themselves before.

        In short, you sound like a shill for war crimes, whether you mean to or not, and you should reflect on why you feel it’s important to quibble about the difference between “crimes against humanity” and “genocide.” This is not an international courtroom.