- cross-posted to:
- fuck_ai@lemmy.world
- cross-posted to:
- fuck_ai@lemmy.world
“It’s also worth reiterating that despite its name, OpenAI is a closed-source and for-profit company — while DeepSeek’s AI models are open-source.”
Smells like there’s a lawsuit just around the corner. How do you license a model as open source if the training data was stolen?
Oh no is the widdle data thief mad his stolen data was stolen?
Someone call the waaambulance.
See, so when they steal from US, it’s fine. But when someone steals from THEM, suddenly we have a problem 🖕
Little known rule of society: it’s OK to steal from people poorer than you.
I don’t believe any of these assholes about anything tbh.
Oh cry me a river, DeepSeek is OpenSource, OpenAI (Which should be renamed to ClosedAI) isn’t
DeepSeeknis the more ethical AI toolkit
DeepSeek is Open Weight, as in weights are available*
Anything needed to actually train the model is as closed as ClosedAI is.
Oh noooo!
Anyway.
There’s a name for that. It’s called “karma”.
This is a “not the onion” level headline, holy shit
But, DeepSeek wouldn’t be able to make money without using OpenAI.
Same what OpenAI said about copyright material they used to train ChatGPT.
Felony contempt of business model
Womp womp cry more ai tears
-> <-
If you zoom in on the line above, and I mean really zoom in you will see a violin small enough to express my level of sympathy.
i’m at 1200000% zoom and i can’t see it!?
Keep going! It’s almost visible!
Lol. Lmao.
Oh no, someone stole my stolen work without permission?