• MNByChoice@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    In simulations mimicking high-speed environments, the waste-heat system demonstrated great versatility; their system produced up to 56 W for car-like exhaust speeds and 146 W for helicopter-like exhaust speeds, or the equivalent of five and 12 lithium-ion 18650 batteries, respectively.

    A great step!

    Next is build one.

    Then cheap-ish and durable.

    • Sibbo@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      I doubt this will ever become any useful at all. 50 Watts is nothing compared to what the car engine outputs at high speed. Even a small engine has some 35kW, i.e. 35000 Watts.

      • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        I doubt regenerative braking will be ever useful at all because Lord knows you’re not going to get the same energy back that you took out while driving. /s

        This is just to increase efficiency.

        • TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 days ago

          Sometimes efficiency gains aren’t worth the cost and complexity. Regenerative braking produces a shitton more power than this, so it’s worth it. You can get the same thing by slapping a solar panel on the roof. Which nobody is doing because it’s too costly and complex for what you get out of it.

      • jawa21@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        I could see it maybe being used as an emergency back up alternator, just enough to keep lights on and engine firing (with storage) to get you to safety.

        • boonhet@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 days ago

          Wouldn’t be powerful enough actually. You’re better off having a battery that’s in good condition. I’ve done nearly 100 km with the alternator belt off. It being a diesel, it didn’t need to fire sparks though.

          • Revan343@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 days ago

            It being a diesel, it didn’t need to fire sparks though.

            That’s cheating :P