• شاهد على إبادة@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    Twitter should have been regulated as a common carrier and one rich asshole shouldn’t have been allowed to buy it, regardless of their politics

    • unphazed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      Honestly I feel all news and social messenging services would be better served if they were forced to be public owned.

    • TWB0109@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      A lot of people unfortunately. Specially people outside the US, I think mastodon is ready for people to switch, but nobody does, the most they do is switch to bluesky

      • Hazel『They/Them』@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        Unfortunately fedverse isn’t really ready for the general population, it’s why so many people flocked to bluesky over mastodon. I know I prefer blueskys UI and features over what Mastodon has to offer.

        Though Tumblr is planning to enter the fedverse so maybe that’ll help somehow.

        • TWB0109@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          Yeah idk, maybe I’m not that much of a micro blogger, i was never a twitter/tumblr user, so mastodon is kind of new to me, so I don’t miss any features. As far as UI, I believe most mastodon instances look pretty good, just not a twitter carbon copy like Bluesky, but that’s a matter of taste.

          I believe the biggest problem is “clout” or following, with likes and boosts and stuff like that not being properly federated most of the time, people simply can not “grow”

    • Echolynx@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      Unfortunately, a lot of official government services and representatives are still using it. I saw someone reference a Twitter post about that Canadian plane crash, for instance.

    • Tire@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      A bunch of undecided voter types that pay zero attention to anything that isn’t their hobbies.

  • dsilverz@friendica.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    @cyrano The “problem” (actually, the feature) with those censorship algorithms is that they rely a lot on the “exact contents” of the message (“Scunthorpe Problem”), so X is probably programmed to detect the Signal’s domain and block due to the presence of such link (similar to how Facebook was/is blocking links to the largest PixelFed instances, and then they also decided to block links to DistroWatch and official websites from various Linux distros), so it’s not programmed (yet) to censor just the “hexadecimal/base64/whatever” portion of the link alone. And there’s where Tox could shine: a handle is literally a hexadecimal sequence, without Tox’s domains, without URI Schemas, just a bunch of digits and letters from A to F.

    I don’t know why Tox isn’t mentioned as a “instant messaging platform for whistleblowers”: it got Onion (Tor) tunneling possibility (as well as tunneling it through I2P outproxies because it actually accepts any kind of SOCKS5 proxy), it’s registration-less (even Matrix needs registration) so it’s effectively anonymous IMO.

    SimpleX seems to be that, too, although I didn’t have the opportunity to use it more than I used Tox. But from the little I’ve used it, it’s similar to Signal in the sense that it’s a link (and a large link) and not simply a hash/hex sequence.

    • perestroika@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Tox is nice. My favourite flavour is qTox.

      The typical pattern over here: if someone uses Signal, you guess they’re some military type (wants things to be secure, doesn’t care much about anonymity, wants things to work one way and simply).

      If someone uses Tox, you guess they’re some hacker / anarchist type (wants things to be secure, but also anonymizable, wants things to be flexible, even if it can backfire).

  • Ulrich@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    Here are some workarounds:

    1. Don’t use Xitter
    2. Use your phone number
    3. Use a URL shortener

    He’s not doing anything except getting more bad press for himself.

  • PassingThrough@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    So what’s the opinion here between Signal and SimpleX?

    Signal gets all the attention, and seems more approachable but ties to a phone number which can be a big deal.

    SimpleX ties to nothing but I could absolutely see people I know fucking it up and wondering where their “account” went.

    So, Signal as an common man’s adoptable compromise and SimpleX to nerd out with full “opsec” and disposability? That about right?

    • hossein@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      Signal has been under way more scrutiny than SimpleX. In both academic papers and security audits.

    • Illecors@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      I’m trying to use simplex, mainly for the instance’s chat. 2 things to say:

      • notifications work perfectly even without play store
      • every device has a separate account - I can’t reuse the same one. Not the end of the world, but it’s really annoying
      • PassingThrough@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        From the looks of it, the variety of ways you can purposefully or accidentally destroy your local database, and the strict limits on accessing your profile, really gives me the feeling SimpleX is intended to be extremely disposable and deniable.

        After playing with it I just don’t see it being used for anything expected to be convenient or ongoing. Regarding the one device per account thing, I think the whole point is you just protect your one app, nobody is sneaking in your laptop or tablet, no remote leaks possible from a sync engine. On iOS you can link to a desktop app, but your phone must remain not just on, but in the app and on the pair screen. One twitch out, PC disconnects.

        Feels like something for journalists, whistleblowers, protesters, and all the bad ones. It’s a burner app for your burner phone.

  • misk@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    I was waiting for such endorsement, maybe my friends will switch now.