New research finds that certain packaging materials can show 70% lower emissions than alternatives.

      • Jax@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        24 days ago

        Oil mining is a more urgent issue, yes, but polluting the land with exhausted lithium mines is not the way to divest.

        • cows_are_underrated@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          23 days ago

          The thing with lithium is, that it can be recycled. Can’t say that about coal (etc). Lithium mining is absolute trash, but I hope that we can improve on this.

          • Jax@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            23 days ago

            I understand why it’s considered better, I’m merely elucidating the importance of recognizing that it’s a stop gap measure.

    • FatCrab@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      24 days ago

      Does lithium mining inherently push GHG into the atmosphere? I’m honestly asking because I don’t know much about the process other than it requires significant amounts of processing to extract lithium from its surrounding deposits. But if the source of emissions for lithium mining are solely from powering the equipment, it is not really a climate change issue (though even localized environmental damage is bad and needs to be addressed, of course).