Nope, not me… I’m still trying.

  • nef@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    Sure, but by your definition any thought containing any kind of language would not be “original” because it requires familiarity with the language.

    • ehpolitical@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Now you’re breaking off into something else that fascinates me… symbolism as a highly efficient method of communication. If you test yourself, you’ll find it takes less time for your brain to process symbols than spoken words… and there’s a very short amount of time in there where your brain understands what it’s looking at without the need of any other language other than symbolism.