El Pais paywall can be disabled via reader view in your web browser.
You’re telling me women don’t like vibrators.
I will get a sex robot when it can scoop catboxes and fold laundry.
Genius! It will sell even without the sex
I will get a sex robot when it can order me to scoop cat boxes and fold laundry.
You’re into some weird shit but I respect it
I’m willing to settle for fully self cleaning but I wouldn’t say no a full Maid Fuck Bot
Most men are not much into the idea, either.
Intimacy is something very human, something most people are not ready to trust a machine to do, even if it’s capable of visibly empathetic reactions.
There is a desire to connect with another human being, not programmed to like you, but actually choosing you freely. It’s what people call “feeling it real”.
Most folks I have seen pushing for robotic partners are incels craving at least some form of closeness - having something like this might be better than nothing.
Also, dudes, let’s be real: would you put your dick into a machine much stronger than you? Something goes wrong and you don’t have your precious parts anymore.
Also, dudes, let’s be real: would you put your dick into a machine much stronger than you?
Hell yes
Something goes wrong and you don’t have your precious parts anymore.
Oh, IDK why I interpreted it as like a buff robot lol. 👀
Shardik!
All it took was one search to find plenty of contradictions to that post title.
Isn’t that because women have had vibrators for decades?
Sex with a hella sexy robot? Nice.
Using a hella sexy robot to fill the empitness of no intimacy or authentic mutual connection? Not nice.
For some reason sex with a robot doesn’t feel gross to me — until they start using it to fill a hole (hehe)
They don’t that that much appeal to me as well, and I’m a dude.
archive coz this site has aids
In these sexual relationships, availability and consent will always be taken for granted, something that’s never taken for granted in a sexual relationship with another human being.
People could get used to interacting in a way in which the other person isn’t taken into account as much, meaning that sexual partners could be instrumentalized for the purpose of having sex. That is to say the ‘human-humanoid’ interaction could be transferred to the relationship between two human beings.
…
Unfortunately, however, these advances aren’t being accompanied by deep reflections about the consequences that sex with robots can have.
never taken for granted
In healthy relationships anyway
I thought onlyfans was the cheap and easy desire “fast-food”-like product for women. Or instagram or whatever social media gives people the impression of being center stage. Not robots.
Humans are all different. It’s difficult to accurately generalize them. Some people like only fans, but for other people it does literally nothing for them.
To each their own.
I’d prefer a real hooker.
It’s funny to think that far enough into the future this may be viewed as robophobic.
Make robots look like bears or dolphins?
Realistically how is a man going to design a good sex robot for a woman? Let a woman do that, they’ll get what they want.
Maybe some men like the idea, but I bet most of them would soon find the experience less fulfilling than they had hoped.
Something’s better than nothing
Most of us have hands. This is just a sex toy. The novelty of it being shaped like a whole-ass woman will soon wear off and turn into the same self loathing.
The true nature of the term ‘novelty.’
