President Donald Trump ordered a pause to all military aid to Ukraine, turning up the heat on Volodymyr Zelenskiy just days after an Oval Office blowup with the Ukrainian president left the support of his country’s most important ally in doubt.

The US is pausing all current military aid to Ukraine until Trump determines the country’s leaders demonstrate a good-faith commitment to peace, according to a senior Defense Department official, who asked not to be identified discussing private deliberations.

MBFC
Archive

  • Arda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    Russians agent, we are all witnessing soulles pigs destroy democracy and the lifes of millions for their own gains

  • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    I am not surprised by Orange Krasnov. For the racist Ukrainian MAGAt supporters living in Brighton Beach, give yourself the single finger salute while staring at a mirror. You bunch of dumbfucks, you screwed Ukraine.

  • Teknikal@eviltoast.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Doesn’t really matter most European tech is way ahead of the US anyway, it’s just they the US pay stupid amounts to their own companies. I kinda feel most US tech is a super expensive in comparison honestly.

    I feel a cupholder on a US jet would be valued at something like 50,000. I’d honestly be really curious how a Rafale fared against say a f-35 I suspect it would win

    My suspicion is an European jets would own and devestate an American ones while being a small fraction of the price.

    Yes I am honestly saying while America spends stupid amount off Defense they don’t hold the slightest advantage tech wise.

  • Wren@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    Who had ‘Trump Picks a Fight With Zelenskyy In Order To Justify Pulling out Of Aid Agreements- Thereby Allowing Russia To Walk On In And Take What They Want’ on their bingo card?

    We all saw this coming, right? The whole bullshit forced argument he created… Tell me I’m not the only one that knew this was set-up to justify withdrawing all support and letting Russia have Ukraine.

    • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      You don’t know that, and I’m skeptical that Trump would go to that much trouble to come up with an excuse. He hasn’t needed an excuse to do anything else he’s been doing.

      What I would expect Trump to do is just pull support and if anybody asks him why, say loudly “America First!!!”

      • smeenz@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        It’s exactly how trump operates. See the threat he posted this morning to block federal funding to universities that “let students protest” - he’s going to block funding anyway, he just needs a plausible way to blame them for it.

        Same thing here - a plausible way to blame Ukraine for withdrawing US support.

        Plausible to maga anyway.

  • Lanske@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    I have not a lot of knowledge how American politics work, but isn’t this for congress to decide? how is Trump so powerful? (sorry for my daft question)

    • deaf_fish@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      We are entering a “yeah and who’s going to stop me era of US politics”

    • Furbag@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      It is for Congress to decide such matters. It says so right in our constitution, but our Legislative branch has been ceding their ability to check Executive overreach for decades. Now, with a complicit Congress as the majority, they will never challenge Trump on anything he does, no matter how unconstitutional or illegal it might be. Same goes for the Judiciary as well, chock full of partisan hacks who bend and twist their interpretation of the language of the constitution to cherry pick a favorable ruling for anything that Trump does.

      Basically, our system of checks and balances that are meant to keep one aspect of the government from becoming too powerful has been completely subsumed by ideologues who prefer monarchy to democracy. The executive now essentially has unchecked authority and is in full control of the government apparatus.

    • ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      It isn’t daft. The Republicans since Reagan have pushed a fringe legal theory called the Unitary Executive Theory. Basically, they want the president to fully control the executive branch and military such that theirs is the only voice that matters for much of the government. Not unlike a king, but partially checked by congress and the courts. They have been taking (illegal) actions to try to get sued, and also have been suing others/other branches of government, to try to get the Supreme Court to hear cases that will support this fringe legal theory so that it becomes the law of the land.

      I am not a lawyer, but this is possibly something Trump can legally do since he is Commander in Chief of the armed forces. However, this seems more like an apportionment thing, which is Congress’ responsibility. Congress has allocated funds to send military aid to Ukraine. So, even if Trump as Commander in Chief could say “no more weapons to ukraine”, it seems doubtful to me that he could (legally) stop weapons shipments currently en route.

      But, by the time whatever government office sues the office of the president to get a judge to enjoin them to send the agreed upon weapons that were already apportioned, it will already have hurt Ukraine somewhat. Trump often weaponizes inefficiency. And these sort of illegal acts aren’t crimes per se - they’re just procedural breaches - the legal remedy is just to reverse the action.

      So, probably not legal. But Trump gets to weaponize his administration’s incompetence (or feigned incompetence) to at least delay aid. More competent people may support these actions, knowing they’re illegal, to try and strengthen the president’s role even further.

        • AES_Enjoyer@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 days ago

          The answer is simpler than that: the “checks and balances” system is a facade created to prevent meaningful progressive policy from passing. There’s a reason why Trump can modify a billion laws from day 1, but poor Biden couldn’t possibly do anything to codify abortion as a right or prevent the bombing of children in Gaza.

          • ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            5 days ago

            This isn’t quite right. Trump didn’t really modify laws. That isn’t even something he can claim to do since he is the head of the Executive branch, not the Legislative one. He issued executive orders, many of which were illegal, and he had some cronies who enacted some of them anyway - others did not enact some of these. He did rescind many policies, but he can’t just make laws go away on his own. There are literally hundreds of court cases currently challenging these executive orders - seeing as how the judiciary is the primary check on the executive branch, that is the system working to check presidential power.

            However, I am not a liberal, I am a socialist and do not think this is working well - there are many problems here. The highest levels of the judiciary have been largely captured by far-right judges, many of whom are specifically aligned with Trump’s goals and support the unitary executive theory. Also, this method of checking presidential power is extremely slow. For every illegal action Trump’s administration takes, a court case has to be crafted, filed, heard, and adjudicated. Every one. And invariably, some will not reach the correct outcome and others will never actually be taken to court - there are just too many.

            Basically, the administration is using the fact that they control every branch of government to dismantle or capture core government agencies and to provide cover for various illegal actions - forcing them through if only temporarily for various political and structural ends. A soft coup, basically. So yeah, the fact that something like this is possible is proof of the flaws inherent in this system of government.

            • AES_Enjoyer@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 days ago

              That’s a lot of words to say that I’m right in practice even if not in principle lmao.

              I’m a commie too, BTW. You’re way too charitable to the US institutions IMO.

    • Soulg@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      Republicans hold the majority in congress, so they’re refusing to push back and are just allowing him to usurp power from them.

      • Lanske@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        Thnx for your reply! i understand that, but it seems nothing goes via congress?!

        • jackeryjoo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 days ago

          Congress is a check and balance to executive power, just like the judicial.

          They are not checking or balancing his power. So they are in effect, impotent.

      • KeenFlame@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        And very seriously listen and write down his commands and say of course sir then just not do it. For years and report back to him that he is hailed as the best president ever for his orders, and let him live his fantasy, we can even hold parades and stuff and the fun thing is that people would actually genuinely be glad when he comes because they know it’s going to be a festival and their job is just to pretend to be awed by his senile ramblings, which honestly sounds so much fun

  • GrymEdm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    The US wouldn’t stop military aid to Israel while the IDF destroyed hospitals and killed children and journalists among many other war crimes. They will freeze aid to Ukraine as it defends itself in a war of conquest. Evidence suggests the USA would rather align with criminals like Putin and Netanyahu than war victims.

    • Spzi@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      That really is a stark contrast. What do the apologetics say about this?

      • Zink@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        In my limited exposure to the ramblings of conservative acquaintances, they now consider Zelensky to be a “little dictator” who was rude to their favorite douches.

        Regarding Israel, I think it’s something along the lines of “judeo-christian values” good, brown savages bad, and OH LOOK SOMETHING SHINY!! Sorry, you were saying?

  • Grizzlyboy@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    Since he can’t do this and needs congress’ help, why aren’t they stopping him? Why are they all bending over backwards to please Putin?

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    Just as his master told him.

    The US media still does not dare to call Trump a Russian agent, despite him showing all symptoms.

    There has been no single Russian attempt to destroy the US being as successful as putting their own agent into the White House, right into the Oval Office.