The thing is we are not talking about visiting countries. We are talking about the virtual World Wide Web.
The thing is we are not talking about visiting countries. We are talking about the virtual World Wide Web.
What on Earth are you on about? “denigrate Americans”. They are pointing out facts. That you apparently are so fragile that you consider that denigration is entirely on yourself.
Your comment is very typical of that (fallacious) US centrism. People write in English on the internet because that is the universal language. There are far more secondary English speakers on the internet than primary English speakers.
Beans are native to Europe.
The thing is that it is on their own internal instance from which most other instances have defederated, so the audience they are trolling are mainly themselves. That kinda debunks the “they are only trolling/baiting” claims in my view.
Well then I guess I need a new vehicle because I’m a handyman and I use a truck.
Yes, yes you do.
Cool. Then you get what you want, because this is exactly what tiktok is.
It has nothing to do with “opposing ideologies”, it is how you are behaving like toxic assholes 100% of the time.
Nah, it is just a lot of hexbear alt accounts like yourself on your disingenously labeled “reasonable” side.
How about adressing the issue instead of just cresting strawmen about the messengers?
This feature is an actual fundamrntal privacy issue.
You will need some speakers with those amps though. The amps themselves won’t say anything.
A lot of US defaultism going on in this thread. Americans (and perhaps British) talking about the North American grey squirrel as the incarnation of all squirrels, when people elsewhere in the world would have very different experiences with their local native squirrels, who act quite differently to those.
Depends on where you live. I only have the Eurasian red squirrel in my country, and they are definitely not a nuisance to any vegetable planting plans.
It seems to me that the major issue people were complaining about was the thing even existing in the first place (and rightly so). So by them still wanting to implement it, they have fixed absolutely nothing.
*Mikkelsen. Mikkelson is Swedish, so kinda an insult to Danes.
This argument keeps missing that it is not only the quality but mainly the quantity of fakes which is going to be the problem. The complete undermining of trust in photographic evidence is seen as a good thing for so many nefarious vested interests, that this is an aim they will actively strive for.
It is the quantity of fakes because of the easy process which is going to be the problem. Fake pictures will very soon outnumber real, and the amount of them will still kerp grjwing exponentially even after that.
The thing is that in the future the mere quantity of fakes will make the careful vetting process you describe physically impossible. You will be bombarded with high quality fakes to such an extent that you will simply have to give up trying to keep up, so it will be a choice of either dropping the vetting process or dropping bringing any pictures altogether. For profit driven corporate jwbed media outlets, the choice unfortunately will be obvious.
Yeah, it is going to be mainly a quantity issue rather than a quality one. The quality of faked photos has already been high since photoshop. Now a constant growing avalanche of high quality fakes (produced by all sorts of different vested interests with their own particular purposes) is going to barrage us on a daily basis, simply because it is cheap and easy
The World Wide Web is not an American invention. Who invented what is completely irrelevant in this context anyway though.