Global leap to 4G and 5G would cut off phone access for millions of vulnerable people.

  • Telecom companies aim to profit from the 2G-to-5G transition as governments worldwide face pressure to free up mobile spectrum.
  • Vietnam is the latest country to shut down 2G by offering free 4G phones to the poor.
  • India and South Africa have expressed concern that the strategy would cut off phone access for millions of vulnerable people.
  • /home/pineapplelover@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Well 2g is good because it reaches be further doesn’t it? Say if you’re in the wilderness, there’s a slim chance 2G might work

      • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        16 hours ago

        I’m a ham radio operator; it just feels weird hearing someone call 400 MHz “long range.” Above, say, 60 MHz I wouldn’t count on anything beyond line-of-sight anyway, though I suppose the lower in the UHF band you are the more likely you are to punch through leaves and such.

  • aceshigh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m in a recovery group and someone shared how dangerous 5G was and that they have to move again because there is too much 5G in their area…. I’m still dumbfounded.

    • cows_are_underrated@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      I am still baffled by these idiots after I learned how 5g works. It isn’t just frequencies increases (I could see why someone might be sceptical about this one). The main difference is simply using another protocol which allows to send more bits with a single signal.

      • turmacar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        If there is any thought to it, it usually goes something like “Radio is/was fine because it’s kilo/megahertz, Wifi/5G is gigahertz waves of electromagnetic radiation.(?!?!)”

        Could always point to the Terahertz electromagnetic radiation source plugged into their nearest lightbulb socket and ask how that doesn’t hurt them.

      • limer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        Not yet another protocol invading me brain!?? For all I know the different pattern of signal does things to my delicate nets.

        I already had to contend with the fridge and garage door

    • Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      The “g” stands for generation. So it’s the 5th iteration of the technology versus the 2nd iteration. Whilst there are many improvements (speed, capacity, security etc) there are some negatives. (I believe mainly to do with signal penetration - i.e. getting a signal in basements, stone wall houses, being behind objects etc.)

      Where I’m currently staying I have: 2G, edge, 4G and 5G signals available.

    • Allero@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Obviously Internet speed and call quality, plus there are many good technical changes under the hood, such as proper isolation of calls etc.

      • Excigma@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        I think it handles congestion better and saves energy for the cell tower. It’s a good choice for crowded city centres, near university campuses and train stations where many people frequent

        • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          Already unable to make use of 4G’s capabilities, virtually nobody feels the speed of 5G. and I’m not an average user, I’m making use of my uncapped home internet!

          • Revan343@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 day ago

            I would probably notice the difference if I had cellular home internet, so I could see the use there. Oh my phone, yeah, the only way I can tell is by watching for the icon to change

  • LaggyKar@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    A big blocker that the article surprisingly doesn’t talk about is tons of IoT stuff that uses 2G and 3G. Stuff like alarm systems, emergency phones, street light control, cars etc. Here in Sweden there was recently a report that thousands of elevators have emergency phones using 2G and 3G, and if the network is shut down you would no longer be allowed to use those elevators. And since 2018 all new cars in the EU has to have eCall, which alerts emergency services on a crash. Many of these use 2G and 3G, and if it stops working the car won’t pass inspection so you’ll no longer be allowed to drive it.

    • Mad_Punda@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I’m in Sweden too. I was considering buying a used car made in 2023. It uses 2G/3G. It has some connected services I actually wanted to use. And well, the ecall obviously. It’s really not an old car yet, but it becomes obsolete already.

      On the manufacturer’s website they say that new car models need to have 4G/5G only by 2026. And starting 2027 all cars sold must have it. 2027 is also when they expect 2G to be fully shut down in the country. This timeline makes no sense for devices with a long life span.

      In the website they also say you wouldn’t fail inspection though. But honestly I don’t care too much about that, since I actually care about ecall and some other connected services.

    • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      I have a feeling we’re going to regret a lot of the “From 201x all new cars have to have ibuttfuck.” It’s like paying to be assimilated by the goddamn Borg.

  • Geodad@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    They don’t want to. Stingray devices force a phone to fall back on 2G so they can spy on it.

  • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    subsidize 4G and 5G devices and shut off 3G and just leave 2G alone for a while. It’s not like it takes up that much bandwidth. A couple of hundred kilohertz is not going to make a difference on 5G.

    You can get like 5 or 10 megahertz off of 3G, which actually would be something worth pulling off and moving to 5G. But the couple hundred kilohertz on 2G is just not going to make that much of a difference.

    • octobob@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I think a lot of rural areas in the US still rely on 3G. I’ve definitely seen my phone switch to it out in the sticks

      I also know for a fact some of our systems at work that pump liuqid nitrogen still use 3G modems for communicating data

      • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        What carrier is this? I know for a fact that T-Mobile has shut down their 3G network and I thought AT&T and Verizon did as well, but I can’t swear to that. I know for a fact that AT&T has already shut down their 2G network though.

        Anywhere where a 3G signal would be used, 2G will be used if the 3G is not available.

        • octobob@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          Gonna be honest, it’s been a while since I’ve been out to the country. I just saw most carriers shut down 3G in 2022. Time flies and all that.

          Also now that I think about it, we may have been installing 4G LTE modems on our pumps lately. That customer only buys a few systems a year.

          I wonder too, say 3G gets totally shut down in the US. Will new phones still be able to connect to it if I’m traveling outside the US? I was bopping around some small islands in the Pacific last year and was heavily relying on 3G for things like maps.

  • Madis@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Well, they shouldn’t turn it off any time soon, just like they don’t turn off analog radio. TV is one I can understand where turning off old methods makes sense, because people upgrade their TVs and use IPTV much more likely anyway.

  • Fake4000@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    You will be surprised how many old people rely on health monitoring devices that use 2G to send basic data.

    • henfredemars@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Not just old people. I had a heart monitor a couple years ago that’s only made for 2G.

      Alright maybe I’m getting old but that’s not the point.

      When I was visiting the Caribbean they also had a lot of 2G infrastructure still operating.