I am tired of Firefox shitty takes.

  • blind3rdeye@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 hours ago

    It really is a shitty take. Mozilla are essentially saying they depend on Google remaining a monopoly; and that we shouldn’t fight the bad guys because the bad guys might hurt us if we try.

    The Mozilla blog post was all about the DOJ asking to end search-bar payments, and how this might hurt independent browser. But I saw no mention of the DOJ saying that Google must sell Chrome; which I think is very relevant to the discussion about browser dominance.

    More and more I believe that Mozilla’s current leadership are acting in their own self interest, not for the public good.

  • dagarnok@50501.chat
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    Mozilla is such a disorganized company. Why wouldn’t they find another search engine deal besides Google? It’s possible that they could find another deal somewhere, but it seems to me that they don’t care — more like they’re a controlled competitor. I’m not surprised considering they scrapped their wording regarding privacy, which leads to a lot of ambiguities.

    • morrowind@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Google overpays quite a bit so they have a viable competitor to point to for chrome. If the payment tracked FF’s usage numbers it would be way lower now. It makes no financial sense for any other search engine to pay that much.

      That’s assuming they could even afford it. Most can’t

      • freely1333@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Not to mention a lot of companies are seeing search as a dead end product…

        The problem with Mozilla is that their route back to greatness would require consolidation that cannot and will not happen due to lack of trust and diverging goals.

        Mozilla + Proton + maybe a third party like Kagi for search (though it is api based) as separate but federated organizations is the only rational option for them ever reclaiming what Firefox used to be.

        It feels like the world is too far gone for this to ever happen. Cynicism, pervasive internet and surveillance culture, and apathy just don’t make the world feel like it could go any direction people want anymore. Feels like we know the track for this and any new corporation in tech and the uber etc were the last of the unicorns where we actually bought into tech improving our lives.

        /rant

        • JuxtaposedJaguar@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          12 hours ago

          The problem with Mozilla is that their route back to greatness would require consolidation that cannot and will not happen due to lack of trust and diverging goals.

          I completely disagree; any capital available to Mozilla would be funneled into all the wrong places. Proton would go bankrupt for the sake of Mozilla’s AI and CEO bonuses.

          Firefox should split from Mozilla like Thunderbird did, and only then consider partnering with another project. Actually, a partnership between Firefox and Thunderbird would be great.

    • bluGill@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 hours ago

      It is Mozilla the non-profit I want gone, along with their wholly owned for profit company that controls firefox.

      • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        16 hours ago

        100%. Firefox would be better off, I suspect, by focusing on the browser, solely, and with a distributed global team that didn’t need a fancy SF office and fancy SF comp packages.

  • Darkcoffee@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    21 hours ago

    I mean, I see their point, but it’s still a bad take. At the end of the day, this monopoly needs to be broken up. Also, have they tried not hiring a bunch of new executives and capping CEO pay at 300 000?

  • venotic@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Why the hell would anyone defend Firefox/Mozilla anymore? Why, because they aren’t google? That’s a weaker argument the more times Mozilla finds ways to distrust their userbase.

  • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    21 hours ago

    honestly I don’t see the thing here. unless its about edge being a respin of chrome. all macs come with safari, all windows edge, ironically its a few linux distros that come with chrome while others use a default foss browser. I feel like their biggest monopoly is windows giving up and using their core rather than making their own.

  • SaltSong@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    22 hours ago

    I’m pretty sure that the main reason Google funds Mozilla is to be able to avoid claims of monopoly on browsers. I don’t think we can have it both ways.

  • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Mozilla has been taken over from within by google parasites…

    Frankly its days are numbered and we will need a solution how to keep the engine development going.

  • emb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    22 hours ago

    If anyone else was confused by the typo, difficult > default.

    I’m not sure what to think. On one hand, yes, Google is of course slimy. But if Mozilla loses it’s big source of funding (and crumbles as a result), that may put things in a worse place?

    Then again, it’s a shame that the only major competing browser engine is funded by the dominant browser’s company. Maybe Mozilla can be fine without it?

  • the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    22 hours ago

    I wish there was a better way to do it but sadly right now this is it. If you want independent browsers to continue they need funding from somewhere.

    • heavydust@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 hours ago

      They can take the salary of the CEO to fund the browser, they can ask for donations that go directly to the browser, they can make subscriptions with useful services. So many ideas that they didn’t try in the past 10 years. But it’s easier to get free money from Google and do nothing.

      • the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        18 hours ago

        I’d love to live in whatever fantasy land selfless compassionate CEO’s come from, sadly it’s just a fantasy.

        • JuxtaposedJaguar@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 hours ago

          I think most people would be happy if the Mozilla CEOs “only” got a few hundreds of thousands of dollars per year. The current pay is literally millions.